i think devs have done right not developing stereoscopic effect, why...

[raaaid]

yes i can put a thread in a needle cause i have pseudostereoscopic view

but plz dont you agree that the depth perception of a 3d game or movie is different to that of real life?

thats my whole point for it not being implemented since would be kind of cheating augmented reality

the thing is FIVE TIMES IN MY LIFE I HAD A 20 SECONDS PERCEPTION IDENTICAL TO THAT OF A 3D MOVIE

therefore my confusion

i know my perception of 3d is wrong cause ive had brief times of awesome depth perception(like in a movie)i wonder about the rest

for example could marseill excelsior at deflection shooting be due to having had authentic steroscopic sight contrary to the rest?

[droz]

funny. Not sure weather you know this or not, but it is both eyes that give depth perception. Walk around for 12 hours with one eye closed, see what happens. It's a biologically proven fact that you lose almost all sense of depth perception when you only have one eye, which is also the reason why you cannot get a medical clearance to fly an airplane in real life without the use of a safety pilot.

Simply closing/covering one eye for a few seconds, or even a few minutes, doesn't really give you that sense of loss of depth perception. go a full day with an eye patch. Try to drive, or even walk. THEN, come back and tell us what we should or should not want.

As for 3D support, don't care either way.

[raaaid]

yes youre right cause with one eye you dont even have pseudostereoscopy

but do you really think im bizarre because of wondering why in a 3d movie i have a "bizarre" perception which i dont have in real life?

and i bet im not the only one