Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-19-2011, 09:58 AM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc_uk View Post
Im not Talking about getting every little detail right
Im on about, the fact is, there is no british navy in this game, and it was a big part of the battle of britian
Here is a nice read
Battle of Britain was won at sea

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1527....-Discuss.html
Hi Doc,

Sorry I forgot we originally discussed the wider involvement in the BoB, and I am not denying that there was more than just air battles, my point was that this is a flight sim focussing on the air to air mainly (right or wrong it is the most widely romanticised aspect of the Bob), by token of your linked article should we perhaps change this game to a naval simulator instead? obviously not, all I was saying is that the naval aspect of the game is low priority (just my oppinion) there is plenty of time to get this content into game eventually (I do hope it does).
  #2  
Old 06-19-2011, 10:15 AM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

I'd say it was the existence of the Royal Navy which was a strong deterrent, not its involvement.

That is if you believe the Germans were seriously going to invade at all.


But this is getting a bit OT!
  #3  
Old 06-19-2011, 12:04 PM
KG26_Alpha KG26_Alpha is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Default

I'm closing the thread down for a short while, you can all take a deep breath and start thinking about what you are posting instead of the constant drivel of late.
  #4  
Old 06-20-2011, 06:41 AM
dougandtoni dougandtoni is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 63
Default

boo hoo
  #5  
Old 06-20-2011, 10:51 AM
Bobb4 Bobb4 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 553
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KG26_Alpha View Post
I'm closing the thread down for a short while, you can all take a deep breath and start thinking about what you are posting instead of the constant drivel of late.
A permenant closure of this thread is long overdue
  #6  
Old 06-20-2011, 10:56 AM
Wolf_Rider Wolf_Rider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
Default

Yeah, I agree... nothing worse than the constant degeneration of almost every thread.

There's something to be said for "free speech" but when it goes toxic the stick should come out
__________________
Intel 980x | eVGA X58 FTW | Intel 180Gb 520 SSD x 2 | eVGA GTX 580 | Corsair Vengeance 1600 x 12Gb | Windows 7 Ultimate (SP1) 64 bit | Corsair 550D | Corsair HX 1000 PSU | Eaton 1500va UPS | Warthog HOTAS w/- Saitek rudders | Samsung PX2370 Monitor | Deathadder 3500 mouse | MS X6 Keyboard | TIR4

Stand alone Collector's Edition
DCS Series



Even duct tape can't fix stupid... but it can muffle the sound.
  #7  
Old 06-20-2011, 11:32 AM
Tvrdi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

then again if CLOD is what it should be (in content, features, optimisations and graphics) we would have different topics....
  #8  
Old 06-20-2011, 11:37 AM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvrdi View Post
then again if CLOD is what it should be (in content, features, optimisations and graphics) we would have different topics....
Not really.....just about every game has it's dedicated haters and people who make a habbit of complaining, I have seen it on every forum I visit.
  #9  
Old 06-20-2011, 09:56 AM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver View Post
Hi Doc,

..............., my point was that this is a flight sim focussing on the air to air mainly ...........).

well, 1C realesed o lot of flyable bombers, fortunatly (in contraire to original IL2 in 2001 btw ).
And its alwasy nice to have targets for them , even better if these are amlost historical
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.