What about a better simulation?

[whoarmongar]

Dont listen to them, LoL means Load of Lies.

[bob_baer]

I don't understand the problem. My question was: is it possible to improve this really wonderful simulation by including the radio commands, tailwheel and a little more of pdf file?

[bongodriver]

Originally Posted by bob_baer

I don't understand the problem. My question was: is it possible to improve this really wonderful simulation by including the radio commands, tailwheel and a little more of pdf file?

in time these issues will be adressed I'm sure, as for tailwheel I believe none of the stock aircraft had a locking tailwheel in real life.

[bob_baer]

I think tailwheel block is mandatory with a "non tricycle" gear in a real plane. Combat flight simulator 3 had this feature.

[bongodriver]

I can assure you it is not mandatory....or all the taildraggers I fly are 'broken'

[Plt Off JRB Meaker]

Originally Posted by bob_baer

I think tailwheel block is mandatory with a "non tricycle" gear in a real plane. Combat flight simulator 3 had this feature.

Erm....with all respect,just because 'Combat flight sim 3'has this feature it does'nt mean that it was a great flight sim,on the contrary I personally thought it was awful,iL2 COD with all it's faults is far more realistic than that effort from Microsoft.

[skouras]

thats true
CFS3 VS IL2
IL2 WINNERMuch more realistic and accurate...