Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: Stable Patch or Features / Content?
Stable Patch? 89 73.55%
More Features or Content? 32 26.45%
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-25-2011, 10:33 AM
Fragal Fragal is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 51
Default

Being selfish and voting for more content too , latest patch has solved the majority of issues for me happily flying online quite well now.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-25-2011, 11:30 AM
Redroach's Avatar
Redroach Redroach is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 709
Default

I can't vote because the option that should receive at least 95% of the votes is not there: "both."
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-25-2011, 11:55 AM
Sauf Sauf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragal View Post
Being selfish and voting for more content too , latest patch has solved the majority of issues for me happily flying online quite well now.
+1
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-25-2011, 11:57 AM
Ali Fish
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redroach View Post
I can't vote because the option that should receive at least 95% of the votes is not there: "both."
what he said ! +1
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-25-2011, 12:03 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz View Post
personally my performance now is OK but as a whole community wise

Performance/stability
FM corrections
Added content
Pretty much runs ok for me too, on a two year old PC no less, but i'll go along and agree with this, even adding a couple more:

1) Performance/stability

2) FM/DM corrections if and where they are needed

3) Gameplay related issues like the gyrocompass on the Ju88 or the inconsistent control logic between different aircraft: should our controllers correspond to a function of the in-cockpit controller (enrich mixture) or a position (mixture lever forward, whatever that means for the plane you're flying)?
Currently it's one way in some aircraft (eg, the in the G50 you move the throttle forward for more power and the in-cockpit animated throttle moves back like it was in the real fighter, the game controller corresponds to a function/effect) and the other way in others (the mixture lever on all RAF aircraft is reversed and we have to use it the same way, in this case mixtur commands correspond to the lever positions and depending on how these levers are set-up in the aircraft we get the final effect). It's also completely mixed up in some, like the Tiger Moth and the DH-prop Hurricane.

4) Amended Documentation to teach people what to do with those gameplay features.
There's a bunch of stuff that people cry "bug/broken/etc" about, which are actually realistic limitations of the aircraft and intentional features.

True, people bring all their IL2:1946 gaming habits and expect the new thing to work the same, but we can't really blame them when documentation doesn't go a bit more in depth on the main points of interest that generate most of the confusion.

What we can blame them for is not searching the forum for previous answers and not ever testing anything for themselves, this is appropriate and acceptable

5) Extra content


There's no real reason to have extra content before the current content works as intended. The majority of players can't manage a radial engined aircraft or level bomb yet or change skins or save loadouts, etc etc....if they could, they would be busy enough enjoying what's there and this would buy the devs the needed time to work on more content.

Let's fix and document what's needed to have the complete list of currently available aircraft operating in they way they should be, then we can start adding more stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-25-2011, 01:23 PM
carguy_ carguy_ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: optimist
Posts: 647
Default

The poll is flawed, since the idea is to bring both to the table simultaneously.

Besides that, since the 2nd official patch, most of the PCs seem to run the game fine. I know I didn`t get more than two CDTs in a 12 hour CoD usage. We need the additional content. First should be multiplayer scene to recreate the IL2 coops, then maybe we should get some ships to sink and then maybe new planes.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-25-2011, 02:16 PM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redroach View Post
I can't vote because the option that should receive at least 95% of the votes is not there: "both."
Agreed, although if there was an option for total bug elimination, I'd go for that.

Sound bugs, stripes of land in the water bugs, stripes of water in the land bugs, props hidden by clouds bugs, big mauve rectangle in the landscape bugs, clouds and their shadows flickering annoyingly bugs, grass poking through your wing bugs, white dots from vehicle locations showing through your plane bugs, and bugs , bugs, bugs etc.

Oh, and an option to hide info boxes without deleting them altogether, because I did this and even if I reconfigure them all and save, they don't reappear on relaunching the game. But then I could've missed something.

Last edited by ATAG_Dutch; 05-25-2011 at 02:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-25-2011, 02:48 PM
nearmiss nearmiss is offline
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,687
Thumbs up

There are disabled features in COD that can be enabled as the patches for a workable COD are released as well. So any poll response really doesn't make any information of value to anyone.

In other words, the poll has no value... sorry bout that.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-25-2011, 02:55 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

well, IF all the already included content would work or could be used properly, we would have a hell of a game..................long way to go !
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-25-2011, 03:17 PM
Wolf_Rider Wolf_Rider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
Default

strip it down and put it on go jacks

1. fix the body
2. paint the thing
3. fix the suspension
4. fix the engine
5. fix the drive train
6. fix the steering

then

6. fix the interior

after that

7. run her with pride


everything in order chaps... there's a lot to be fixed
__________________
Intel 980x | eVGA X58 FTW | Intel 180Gb 520 SSD x 2 | eVGA GTX 580 | Corsair Vengeance 1600 x 12Gb | Windows 7 Ultimate (SP1) 64 bit | Corsair 550D | Corsair HX 1000 PSU | Eaton 1500va UPS | Warthog HOTAS w/- Saitek rudders | Samsung PX2370 Monitor | Deathadder 3500 mouse | MS X6 Keyboard | TIR4

Stand alone Collector's Edition
DCS Series



Even duct tape can't fix stupid... but it can muffle the sound.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.