Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Controls threads

Controls threads Everything about controls in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-25-2011, 12:54 AM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

"2, The instument board pp. change lever has labels and positions for groBer and kleiner Drehzahl (increase/decrease rpm) settings but the real one had an extra bottom position: Segelstellung. This was fixed, ie. the lever stayed there and keep the propeller in feathered position when set, explicetely for the purpose of freeing him from the burden of having the keep pressing the lever all the time1!"

And the Devs were made aware of precisely this a while ago ... so hopefully a further fix will ensue.

Mind you I cant think of too many occasions when you would want to feather a prop in a single engine aeroplane. Perhaps in the case of a failed engine and you are trying to minimise drag to increase your gliding range.

Last edited by IvanK; 05-25-2011 at 01:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-25-2011, 01:11 AM
II./JG1_Krupinski II./JG1_Krupinski is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 86
Default

Just my two cents on our options and whether or not a feature was or was not included on any plane.

As far as our options are concerned, I'd love it for the prop pitch lever to function correctly, IMO and I may be wrong, this was push forward and RPM increased, move to middle, and it stops moving, pull it down and it decreases RPM, and again, move to middle it stops moving.

As long as we can functionally get there, and we are IMO, then the graphics can come later if at all. (personally i'd love to see that, but I'm not withholding my support from 1C over it)

Now, whether or not the Auto function with CSU fitted as a field mod came into service in Dec 39 or late 40 is a moot point. Even if it did see service in 39, this is not that plane.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-25-2011, 02:33 AM
heloguy heloguy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
"2, The instument board pp. change lever has labels and positions for groBer and kleiner Drehzahl (increase/decrease rpm) settings but the real one had an extra bottom position: Segelstellung. This was fixed, ie. the lever stayed there and keep the propeller in feathered position when set, explicetely for the purpose of freeing him from the burden of having the keep pressing the lever all the time1!"

And the Devs were made aware of precisely this a while ago ... so hopefully a further fix will ensue.

Mind you I cant think of too many occasions when you would want to feather a prop in a single engine aeroplane. Perhaps in the case of a failed engine and you are trying to minimise drag to increase your gliding range.


From the looks of the switch, and I've seen a few as a mechanic, if it's springloaded in the middle position, then it doesn't have to be in the locked in the lower 'Segelstellung' position in order to feather it. The notch was just built in so that the pilot could quickly reach up in the event of an engine failure, place the switch there, and then the prop would feather as it's being held in the that position. You should still be able to feather the prop by holding the lever down, if you wanted to for whatever reason.
__________________
Asus PZ877-V
Intel i3770k
Nvidia GTX 980
8gb RAM
Windows 10 x64
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-25-2011, 08:17 AM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
And the Devs were made aware of precisely this a while ago ... so hopefully a further fix will ensue.
Good to hear that. Mind you, I am patient with Oleg and his team, I am just noting these issues so if hopefully the Devs read these boards, they have chance to fix it some time or another.

Quote:
Mind you I cant think of too many occasions when you would want to feather a prop in a single engine aeroplane. Perhaps in the case of a failed engine and you are trying to minimise drag to increase your gliding range.
Agreed, its not a serious issue.. though I wonder why they removed it in the first place...?
I may be ignorant of the practical applications of feathering a propeller, but isn't that the only reason you'd want to feather the propeller on any plane...?

A bit of an info I managed to dig up (English transation of the French technical report of Bf 109 E-3 WNr 1304, captured in late 1939 in France, subsequently tested in Britain)

__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org

Last edited by Kurfürst; 05-25-2011 at 09:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.