Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-15-2011, 10:46 AM
Mysticpuma's Avatar
Mysticpuma Mysticpuma is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bromsgrove, UK
Posts: 1,059
Default

Ah, just found out you moved up here rather than in the 1946 forums!

Okay, here is a question for you regarding the (briliiant!) addition of Static aircraft Spawning.

http://youtu.be/CNjbe2GqHB4

At the 1m 50s point when the aircraft start to take-off is there any chance that the timing can be off-set so that the aircraft don't have to wait in turn to take-off?

I make the assumption that the spawning positin has changed only, not the sequence? So if the aircraft were lined upas in the original non-modded version, Aircraft A takes off, B then follows, C then follows, etc, etc.

However, what you have managed to create is the possibility of an Historical take-off with aircraft taking off side-by-side in a formation of 2, or even a Formation of 4 (like a Scramble take-off). I again make the assumption that it would be possible, if the code could be written so-that the newly positioned aircraft (in a Mission created in FMB) could be allowed to start their engines and take-off in synchronisation, rather than A then B then C etc.

Is this at-least a possibility as what you have done is really getting me interested in all the future possibilities!

Brilliant work TD, cheers, MP
__________________
http://i41.tinypic.com/2yjr679.png
  #2  
Old 05-16-2011, 04:04 PM
EJGr.Ost_Caspar EJGr.Ost_Caspar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 939
Default

Since it has been requested quite alot lately:



This is a WIP screenshot - it will probably not be finished before 4.11 release.
__________________

----------------------------------------------
For bugreports, help and support contact:
daidalos.team@googlemail.com

For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications:
IL-Modeling Bible
  #3  
Old 05-16-2011, 04:48 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

I grovel at your feet in recognition of this great act.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
  #4  
Old 05-16-2011, 04:58 PM
76.IAP-Blackbird 76.IAP-Blackbird is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 167
Default

Great a Hawk pit !!!! Have you considered to correct the P-40 wings angle?

Check the ingame wingangle and compare it please with this photo

  #5  
Old 05-16-2011, 05:13 PM
EJGr.Ost_Caspar EJGr.Ost_Caspar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 76.IAP-Blackbird View Post
Check the ingame wingangle and compare it please with this photo

We know. Its especially worse on Merlin versions.
There is a 3rd party approach onto this and other issues.
__________________

----------------------------------------------
For bugreports, help and support contact:
daidalos.team@googlemail.com

For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications:
IL-Modeling Bible
  #6  
Old 05-17-2011, 01:36 AM
harryRIEDL harryRIEDL is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar View Post
We know. Its especially worse on Merlin versions.
There is a 3rd party approach onto this and other issues.
Did someone say Merlin P40s. At long last filling the gaps in P40 range oh good
  #7  
Old 05-17-2011, 03:59 AM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar View Post
We know. Its especially worse on Merlin versions.
There is a 3rd party approach onto this and other issues.
We don't have any Merlin P-40s right now

Just the E and M which are Allison powered.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
  #8  
Old 05-17-2011, 05:20 AM
Fighterace Fighterace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 269
Default

3rd Party or not...I cant wait to see the P-40's wings to be fixed. Can the damage model be improved?
  #9  
Old 05-17-2011, 07:56 AM
EJGr.Ost_Caspar EJGr.Ost_Caspar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceFire View Post
We don't have any Merlin P-40s right now

Just the E and M which are Allison powered.
Ah yes... my fault! I'm not so informed in engines. I meant the ones with the large 'mouth'.
__________________

----------------------------------------------
For bugreports, help and support contact:
daidalos.team@googlemail.com

For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications:
IL-Modeling Bible
  #10  
Old 05-16-2011, 08:14 PM
76.IAP-Blackbird 76.IAP-Blackbird is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 167
Default

A third party? You mean the hacked stuff or an officialy updated later?
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.