Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-07-2011, 12:06 PM
usr usr is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 13
Default

And do not forget the total lack of ground war in BoB. Perfect excuse to focus on the airborne side of things (seems to be hard enough) and not yet have a detailed dynamic campaign, elaborate ground AI and so on in the initial release.

That being said, the ironic side of me would not be fully surprised if finished, perfect ground war code for IL2-style close support missions would be sleeping inside CoD, just the kind of prioritisation mistake that would be totally 1C/MG-style
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-07-2011, 12:20 PM
Pbs Pbs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 18
Default

Hate BOB. Hate machinguns. Want planes with BIG CANNONS, like Ki-84 from Pacific war or BF-109G(K) or La-5(7) from East front.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-07-2011, 02:20 PM
Rattlehead Rattlehead is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 727
Default

Personally I'm up for it all.
North Africa for me is number one, but I'd be more than happy with whatever theatre is next.*
In the original Il-2, I loved Pacific Fighters, I loved the eastern front. I loved all of it, really.
Bring it on...

*With the possible exception of Korea. Not that I don't want to play Korea or fight in the Mig 15 or F-86, but it would seem strange going from BoB to many years forward and a totally different environment with totally different aircraft, and then later on back to WW2 for a stint in the Pacific or Russia.
In my opinion, it would totally break the 'flow' of the series.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-07-2011, 06:25 PM
Kongo-Otto's Avatar
Kongo-Otto Kongo-Otto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Augsburg, Germany
Posts: 391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pbs View Post
Hate BOB. Hate machinguns. Want planes with BIG CANNONS, like Ki-84 from Pacific war or BF-109G(K) or La-5(7) from East front.
Hmmm something to compensate or just lousy aiming skills?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-08-2011, 10:57 AM
Wutz Wutz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kongo-Otto View Post
Hmmm something to compensate or just lousy aiming skills?
+1 nice one Otto!
I also agree with JG53Frankyboy, all the way for the early scenarios, lots of bombers and no über planes. As to the Korean stuff I wouldn´t spend a cent on that, not the least bit interested.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-08-2011, 11:15 AM
Kongo-Otto's Avatar
Kongo-Otto Kongo-Otto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Augsburg, Germany
Posts: 391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wutz View Post
+1 nice one Otto!
I also agree with JG53Frankyboy, all the way for the early scenarios, lots of bombers and no über planes. As to the Korean stuff I wouldn´t spend a cent on that, not the least bit interested.
Even when CoD wouldn't have the BoB scenario and would have been started with a MTO Scenario, there would be the same whining, no P-51, no P-47, why no ME-262, no cannons, no BIG Guns, just P-40 and P-38....sometimes i think that some people didn't even know that there was a war before Dec 7th 1941.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.