how many cores does clod use

[Rattlehead]

Originally Posted by jayrc

my current pc is intel core 2 3 ghz, gt 240 gpu, 350 psu, 3.25gb ram, win xp 32, pretty sad system, barely plays il2 1946, I've been waiting to upgrade for some time now, got money burning a hole in my pocket, not enough to waste though.

May I make a suggestion? Forget getting a CPU at this stage.

If you really must upgrade now, go for windows 7 64-bit (a must) a really decent graphics card and a PSU to match. I suggest a 700-750 watt PSU and a graphics card such as a HD6970 or Nvidia equivlalent. Maybe a bit more ram as well. (extra 1gb)

I am also running a core 2 3ghz, and it runs fine.

I've always been a big believer of video card, then ram, then cpu...in order of importance for gaming.

[Heliocon]

Originally Posted by Rattlehead

May I make a suggestion? Forget getting a CPU at this stage.

If you really must upgrade now, go for windows 7 64-bit (a must) a really decent graphics card and a PSU to match. I suggest a 700-750 watt PSU and a graphics card such as a HD6970 or Nvidia equivlalent. Maybe a bit more ram as well. (extra 1gb)

I am also running a core 2 3ghz, and it runs fine.

I've always been a big believer of video card, then ram, then cpu...in order of importance for gaming.

+1 - he is right

also a 1st gen i7 is better than a second gen i5, better perf per $ in the long run.

[Doc_uk]

This is all you need

[jayrc]

Originally Posted by Rattlehead

May I make a suggestion? Forget getting a CPU at this stage.

If you really must upgrade now, go for windows 7 64-bit (a must) a really decent graphics card and a PSU to match. I suggest a 700-750 watt PSU and a graphics card such as a HD6970 or Nvidia equivlalent. Maybe a bit more ram as well. (extra 1gb)

I am also running a core 2 3ghz, and it runs fine.

I've always been a big believer of video card, then ram, then cpu...in order of importance for gaming.

what would the equivlalent be to the 6970 in nvidia, 570, 580? Is there a problem with going intel with ati, or amd and nvidia? do they mix well?

[Rattlehead]

Originally Posted by jayrc

what would the equivlalent be to the 6970 in nvidia, 570, 580? Is there a problem with going intel with ati, or amd and nvidia? do they mix well?

I would imagine those cards are the equivalent, more or less. The 580 GTX seems to be faster than the 6970, but it also costs more.
The best places to check would of course be guru3d, anandtech, tom's hardware...I don't keep up with the Nvidia side of things much these days...good cards, but I've got an Ati for now, so I don't see the need to know what's going on in the 'green camp'.

As far as your second question is concerned, there is no problems that I'm aware of mixing your Intels, Amds, Nvidia's or Ati's.

[kendo65]

Originally Posted by jayrc

what would the equivlalent be to the 6970 in nvidia, 570, 580? Is there a problem with going intel with ati, or amd and nvidia? do they mix well?

The 570 is approx same level performance and price. 580 is superior and more costly.

[Zoom2136]

Originally Posted by Rattlehead

I've always been a big believer of video card, then ram, then cpu...in order of importance for gaming.

This is true of FPS. Flight sims suffer from a slow CPU (it really is the bottleneck in what we are concern).

So for flight sims, always buy the fastest CPU you can afford. Presently its the i7-2600K, followed closely by the i5-2500K. Remember that the newer i5 & i7 are faster clock for clock than the previous generation. See here:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...m-ii,2926.html

So get the best CPU with a good overclocking motherboard, then if you only run 1 GPU, you can live a less than 600W PSU, if you plan on running SLI/Crossfire go with a 750+ PSU.

In you case the last thing to upgrade should be the video card (GPU). Oleg's game seem to favor Nvidea. Don't know why? I prefer AMD myself. Here look here and decide.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...-590,2912.html

i am a amd fan to, i need to upgrade soon before the game released here.

[Heliocon]

Originally Posted by Zoom2136

This is true of FPS. Flight sims suffer from a slow CPU (it really is the bottleneck in what we are concern).

So for flight sims, always buy the fastest CPU you can afford. Presently its the i7-2600K, followed closely by the i5-2500K. Remember that the newer i5 & i7 are faster clock for clock than the previous generation. See here:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...m-ii,2926.html

So get the best CPU with a good overclocking motherboard, then if you only run 1 GPU, you can live a less than 600W PSU, if you plan on running SLI/Crossfire go with a 750+ PSU.

In you case the last thing to upgrade should be the video card (GPU). Oleg's game seem to favor Nvidea. Don't know why? I prefer AMD myself. Here look here and decide.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...-590,2912.html

Not really and certainly not if they thread it well. You need ram to have the game in memory so the cpu can calculate, you need it for the gpu etc. Also the fastest CPU wont help you if your gpu is crap, in all honesty COD does not push hardware components atm. The fastest i5 will not perform as well as a low range i7 in the future, you may have high GHZ but when my cpu can get double the work done with threading then yours can, you hit a cap where as I havent, because I havent even OCed it yet.

Also I would stay away from anything that is watercooled for a noob, unless he will learn to OC and maintain the system its not worth the cost.

[jimbop]

Originally Posted by Heliocon

Also I would stay away from anything that is watercooled for a noob, unless he will learn to OC and maintain the system its not worth the cost.

Absolutely. Water isn't needed for sandy bridge overclocks unless you go mad with your clock. I'd install water on my GPU instead of CPU for this game anyway.