Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-29-2011, 12:53 PM
reflected reflected is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 346
Default

The question is not what CoD looks like compared to other sims, but what it looks like compared to real life, how can it be improved and whether the devs are willing to make those steps or not.

I kinda like the Hollywood look of Wop as well (for what it's worth), but one really can't compare. Of course that's not realistic, and it's just an arcade game with tiny maps.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-29-2011, 12:59 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reflected View Post
The question is not what CoD looks like compared to other sims, but what it looks like compared to real life, how can it be improved and whether the devs are willing to make those steps or not.
It's closer than any other WW2 flight sim on the market. You'll probably have to come up with something pretty compelling to get changes, and I haven't seen anything that would convince me if I were on the CoD staff.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-29-2011, 01:07 PM
ICDP ICDP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reflected View Post
The question is not what CoD looks like compared to other sims, but what it looks like compared to real life, how can it be improved and whether the devs are willing to make those steps or not.
This!

I could care less how WoP or FSX looks compared to CoD, I look at real life to compare if it looks realistic and at the moment it doesn't.

Last edited by ICDP; 04-29-2011 at 01:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-29-2011, 01:25 PM
Kano_Magnus Kano_Magnus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 17
Default

I'm sure CLOD does look realistic but realistic somewhere that isn't Kent

Please note that "David Hayward" doesn't actually own a copy of this game
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-29-2011, 01:28 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kano_Magnus View Post

Please note that "David Hayward" doesn't actually own a copy of this game
Does ownership of the game change how the screenshots look?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-29-2011, 03:58 PM
Kano_Magnus Kano_Magnus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
Does ownership of the game change how the screenshots look?
I think it's worth letting people know that when you come swanning on to these threads asserting this that or the other about CLOD that you neither own nor have actually played the game; I also think it's fair to assume you aren't au fait with SE England either if you think CLOD is a near perfect simulation of it. I mean to be fair other games have done stuff as dumb as modelling the Dartford Bridge and M25 (EAW) or mistaking the Blackwall Tunnel for a pair of road bridges (FSX) but this game is far from the realism claimed for it. As for

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
No, I'm also saying that there are people who fly over Kent regularly who say the colors look fine.
I presume it's the Labrador that flies the plane then? Your men seem to be in somewhat of a minority, to put it mildly. I mean we have real actual photos on this thread of English countryside, what more do you want? I don't care how much experience you claim to have with aviation photography, you clearly have none with the landscape of England. In summary:

YOU ARE WRONG

Hope that is nice and clear and haze-free for you!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-29-2011, 04:05 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kano_Magnus View Post

YOU ARE WRONG

Hope that is nice and clear and haze-free for you!
Too bad for you that the game's devs agree with me.

Hope that clear enough for you.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-29-2011, 04:06 PM
ICDP ICDP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
Too bad for you that the game's devs agree with me.

Hope that clear enough for you.
All that does is make THEM wrong too.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-29-2011, 04:26 PM
Kano_Magnus Kano_Magnus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
Too bad for you that the game's devs agree with me.

Hope that clear enough for you.
I thought there was a patch on the the way to improve the landscape? I wouldn't be so quick to (attempt to) gloat if I were you. You might end up looking more of a prat than you already do, son. Alternatively, if the devs were (God forbid) to take your attitude, fine, but don't attempt to sell CLOD on the basis of 'unparalleled realism' or some shit. By the way:

YOU ARE STILL WRONG

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackbusheFlyer View Post
What we have in CoD is far better a scene then I could have imagined as a child and gives enough to let our imaginations do the rest.
a) You must have had a pretty poor imagination; b) if my imagination is to be a significant component of the game can I have a rebate please; c) if you really believed this crap you'd be playing Spitfire '40 on a Spectrum emulator, I mean it's practically a blank canvas eh
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-01-2011, 07:38 PM
RomBinDaHouse RomBinDaHouse is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
Too bad for you that the game's devs agree with me.

Hope that clear enough for you.
NO, idiot, NO!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.