Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2011, 06:39 AM
EJGr.Ost_Caspar EJGr.Ost_Caspar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dFrog View Post
Well, the C.205 cockpit isn't the best too. Look at the windshield frame. Do you see the hole in the left upper corner ? You can see through...

Thats because the camera PoV has changed in latest patch.
Each cockpit has its holes, they are mostly not visible.
There will be fixes here and there for various cockpits in future.
__________________

----------------------------------------------
For bugreports, help and support contact:
daidalos.team@googlemail.com

For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications:
IL-Modeling Bible
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-23-2011, 05:59 PM
hiro hiro is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 352
Default

NSU's pics in the first page speak alot. The first picture shows the pilot's nose and its close to eye level (but seems the camera is above).


So the bar might have been too much for the 190. But hopefully they'll RAISE the BAR in IL2 Call of Duty . . . Anyways I'll throw a plug in what great work Team D is doing . . .

For COD, there should have a pilot adjustment where line of sight and head movement changes your view of things . . . like really tall pilots would slouch or short guys would sit on a pillow or something . . .

These beat the horse threads . . . it's like newly released movie Hanna / Japanese Anime. pre teen girls shouldn't be that violent but for some reason one is compelled to watch them do a trail of blood.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-23-2011, 09:07 PM
MaxGunz MaxGunz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 471
Default

The Bar shows up exactly where it should if there is no glass. They didn't model refraction and Oleg stated exactly that. If they couldn't do everything then they wouldn't do that one thing. Possibly because fudging the one would lead to demands to fudge the rest in ones and twos.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.