Gamespot Review for CoD - Score: 4.0

[Heliocon]

Originally Posted by David Hayward

I'm sure your relentless complaining will inspire them.

Maybe, but all you do all day is bitch about anyone who makes valid criticisms of the game. So I would say thats less productive, so either contribute or stop making yourself look like a fanboy kiddy.

-Its not complaining either, its constructive criticism... (99% of the time).

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by Heliocon

Maybe, but all you do all day is bitch about anyone who makes valid criticisms of the game. So I would say thats less productive, so either contribute or stop making yourself look like a fanboy kiddy.

-Its not complaining either, its constructive criticism... (99% of the time).

My contribution is no less than yours. You are whining (99% of the time), and I am responding to your whining with helpful comments.

[Buchon]

Unplayable :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LMft...layer_embedded

[mazex]

Originally Posted by Buchon

Unplayable :

Wow, that is THE coolest fs video I've seen to date Should be uploaded to Gamespot as a user video! ASAP!

[David Hayward]

BTW repeatedly calling people morons isn't nearly as constructive as you seem to think it is.

[Positronic]

gamespot are usually quite slow on their PC reviews, so I'm a bit baffled they reviewed this before the NA release.

That said reviewers by policy have to review the game in released state, patches don't count. Gran turismo 5 suffered a similar fate.

oh well I have 56 hours into farming simulator 2011, and it scored a 2/10

[utu]

I like to see things from my point of view, and Gamespot is painting a bad picture only. From the first moments I thought that the game was unfinished if this is the result of 7 years of hard work. But looking the thinks deeply, I see planes modeled accurately both the exterior and the interior, you can see the internal structure and it is doing part of the damage model. Following this logic every plane required an incredible amount of time because the research, the modeling, etc. In my opinion the simulator is finished but rough, it needs to be "tuned". And it can tune everything there, from what I can see seeing the first patches. For sure, Ubisoft has almost killed this simulator with a crazy policy: anti epileptic filter, probable forcing the dev's team to finish in advance their work. I know this because Ubisoft has killed another sim: Silent Hunter 5, a potential good work from a beautiful romanian team, totally bugged, unfinished and with no more than 2 small patches. Killed. In the perspective of the future, I hope that COD and the team will survive to this bad trend, I see a lot of enthusiasts here and on SIMHQ (never seen 700-800 users in a forum before), and we support the future development of COD.
Henry Ford was a master about negative trends, I think that COD should follow his way.

ps
sorry for my english

[Feathered_IV]

Though it pains me too, the review is a fair call on the current game. Even without the obvious issues with the game engine, there is precious little content to simulate the Battle of Britain in real depth.

[rollnloop]

What were the so called beta testers doing?

I know two of them, here's what they told me after release: dozens of bugs were reported, and not fixed before release. Most are still not fixed today.

[el0375]

I don't care about the number( + usually Gamespot's mark number is somedays not so fair), but what they wrote seems quite fair, although i cant say about sounds as i havent lived sounds of cannons. When i more than few players will start gettign good FPS( which will increase i hope) the online will be a true blast. for now i just tried at my friend's pc( which his speakers are 6+ years old), but hopefully another mate of mines is available for bying the cd
Keep it up 1C !