Cliffs of Dover is a lot of FUN!!!!

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by Tanner

Again, not the point.

Yes, it is the point. You are whining about the lack of content. If you don't like the content, don't buy the game.

Originally Posted by Tanner

There is no room in the games industry for poorly produced, buggy, late, not-feature-complete games.

Except for the people who are having fun playing it, apparently.

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by Tanner

Subjective assertion about the nature of my complaint. There is a lack of content. That is a fact. There is no whining. I am stating facts.

There appears to be plenty of content for him. So what you are really stating is your opinion. And you are whining (in my opinion).

Originally Posted by Tanner

A lot of people are stupid. It can't be helped.

You could stop posting. That might help.

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by Tanner

Incorrect by his own actions. He felt he had to make his own mission days after the game just released. Nearly by definition that precludes making the assertion that there is "plenty of content".

It does nothing of the sort. Making up your own mission is completely unrelated to the existing content.

[squidgyb]

Originally Posted by Tanner

It is completely related for the fact of what he didn't say.

He didn't say, "Wow, the campaign is great." Why? Because it isn't and it is way too short.

He didn't say, "Loving those single player missions". Why? Because they are mere variations on a theme and so few.

He didn't say "Loving that dynamic campaign." Why? Because it doesn't frigging exist as the game is not-feature-complete for a feature that was advertised 5 years ago as a major game feature.

He chose to create a mission in FMB, maybe to get those clouds that you can't get elsewhere, because there was so little compelling content to keep him otherwise occupied.

If one is looking for things to do (as I am) in a game that just launched, there is a serious problem. There is little content in this game in terms of missions and features, and most of that content is in no way compelling in comparison to other PC games within the genre and outside of it. That is fact. Not opinion.

So you've constructed your entire argument over the things someone didn't say in his post?

[I really felt I had to bold, underline and italicise that point, just in case you didn't spot the importance of this little tidbit of information]

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by Tanner

No, I am building on my argument by pointing out what he didn't say

Tanner, building an argument around what people haven't said is path that can come back to bite you in the @ss. For instance, we're still waiting for a definitive statement from you on whether or not you're a moron.

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by Tanner

At least neoqb, makers of Rise of Flight, had the good sense to put up its own multiplayer servers to support its customers rather than letting its customer flounder about with a joke for a multiplayer experience that this game has.

Oddly, the RoF community seems very concerned that IL-2 1946 multiplayer servers are busy while their's are often empty.

[jibo]

Tanner why are you still on this forum btw ?

[Sven]

The FMB comes straight out of heaven, the amount of fun I had with it is incredible, it was my only offline entertainment, as well as other campaigns made in the FMB by other users.

Now that I can simulate complete tank battles and many more, this is gonna kick ass even more!

[David Hayward]

Tanner, if you don't like the lack of support for multi-player right now, don't buy the game.

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by Tanner

And what if I have.

You are SOL.