![]() |
|
|||||||
| Gameplay questions threads Everything about playing CoD (missions, tactics, how to... and etc.) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
This is explained by Sir Stanley Hooker in the excellent BBC documentary Spitfire! Two seconds to kill. If you're in the UK, you can view it here (watch from about 26:00 in); http://www.bbc.co.uk/archive/battleo...in/11405.shtml |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
ill take fuel injection over carburator any time... in the end i think the extra HP you got, you will loose due to constant engine management
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() You really expected to hear Sir Stanley Hooker saying "actually...erm... our engines were a bit like cottage farm compared to the German ones, but hey, we had a little gizmo that they didn't have!" Allowing to fly a plane with an engine that didn't permit negative G manouvres was simply criminal, but that's all they had, so let's not get carried away with your love for the Spit and Hurri, you can't change the fact that the DB601 was a superior engine,period. I reckon that the struts for the tail horizontal surfaces on the Me109 as opposed to the clean Spit and Hurri tail section makes more of an interesting story, there's actually an espionage tale about it too, with a German agent was trying to steal the secret of the tail structure in the UK. I remember overhearing the conversation some years ago, but cant remember the details. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The complex engine management looks promising, but I'm afraid it could discourage many less patient ppl from going full real. Looks good anyway. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I bet you're from germany.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
No I'm not, I just stated a fact, whilst you made a statement that had nothing to do with the quality of the engines..
|
![]() |
|
|