Friday update and discussions 2011-03-11

[ATAG_Dutch]

Originally Posted by Space Communist

Beautiful video, but one thing I was surprised not to see was a certain "jitter" in the instruments. Now maybe somebody can set me right here because I have only been in the cockpit of an (airborne) aircraft once before and it was a 50 year old Piper, but in that thing the needles just kind of bounced around the indicated points on the various dials rather than smoothly pointing at one place. Was that effect just due the age of the aircraft?

No.

Originally Posted by major_setback

Great video. Thanks for presenting it!

A couple of points though: the waves look much too big compared to the cliffs.

The clouds are evenly lit, not darker at the top or bottom; because the sun is approximately at their level. I think they should look darker at the bottom, as the sky is illuminating them very much more than the relflected light from the sea.

I'm surprised major! Don't you think they know?

Originally Posted by Tree_UK

The smoothness may not be a true indication of the game though, It could be made using the new video tools which allow you to smooth FPS drop out when making movies.

I'm not surprised here.

Originally Posted by kendo65

I agree Tree and Furbs. Would be really great to see (hear) a video with all the details and action.

I do suspect that the reason for it not having happened already is because they are having to push it right to the wire to get everything to work.

I understand, but still, disappointed that we haven't seen more at this stage.

What I really can't understand is that the best - by far - videos were the 2 unofficial and swiftly-pulled of the Hurri and 109. They did more to sell me the game than all the rest

I'm really surprised here, Ken.

I've been off the forum for a while, but I have to say it's getting a little barmy (if it wasn't already).

The game/sim is going to be released soon. It's a fair bet that everyone here will buy it (except maybe tree), including all the steam, ubi, DRM moaners.
We'll find out what it's like then. If you don't want to take the financial or other risk, then don't.

Is it possible that 1c games, ubisoft, or Mr Maddox himself doesn't want to show everything, so that we buy it and have a look? The game will then grow by word of mouth, just like Il2 over a period of a decade or more, rather than being simply another over hyped flash in the pan?

Long term sales are desirable after all.

If we were 'drowned' in videos, all the cloud, landscape, wave height, reflection, cliff shadow, tracer (oh for f***s sake), squadron code pigment mix experts would clog up the forum with their usual 'yes but/no you're wrong look at this' blx and just spend their lives arguing about the looks of the tiny details instead of buying the game and playing it.

And yes, I know I've been guilty of it myself on occasions, 'god is in the details' etc (or should it be the devil?).

Just have a bit of patience. We're all going to find out very soon, hopefully.

I've been tinkering with RoF Iron Cross Edition recently. When you're playing it, it looks superb and light years ahead of Il2. (The clouds are well dodgy though and so are the trees and the fields and the grass and the waves, blah blah blah..........)
But as a fellow flying nut I'd recommend it to anyone here.

The videos of Storm of War/Cliffs of Dover/What-Ho, Fritz! look like another quantum leap in comparison.

Have patience, buy the game, have a go, then think about whether you noticed very much of all the things you moaned about.

I've got a feeling that when you're dancing around the sky in mortal combat with an impeccably rendered 109/spit/hurri/whatever, you won't give two hoots about the wave height (how windy was it that day by the way?).

This week's update was really pleasurable for me. A flight of Tigers in the sunset to some really nice music...............ah, yes. I'll have some of that please.