Frankly, these lasers...

TheGrunch · #1 03-10-2011, 04:10 PM

No, in fact I don't get why you had to make such a blatantly sarcastic post regarding someone's assertions about their military experience and then get upset when it was pointed out to you that they do in fact have said experience.

How is it biased to have had years of first-hand experience of something visual and then make visual comparisons based upon that experience? I could spend all day having the *opinion* that the vast majority of 109s had red paint on the nose during the Battle of Britain, but that doesn't mean it's either true or should be in the game.

kimosabi · #2 03-10-2011, 04:16 PM

Did you guys see my amazing lazor shots, or are you more interested in eachother?

TheGrunch · #3 03-10-2011, 04:17 PM

I liked your laz0rs, but I've seen those photos before.

kimosabi · #4 03-10-2011, 04:21 PM

Ok, cool. So why are we havin this thread still? Moar cowbell?

TheGrunch · #5 03-10-2011, 04:27 PM

Yeah, just another repeat-whine thread. Pew pew pew!

fireflyerz · #6 03-10-2011, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGrunch

No, in fact I don't get why you had to make such a blatantly sarcastic post regarding someone's assertions about their military experience and then get upset when it was pointed out to you that they do in fact have said experience.

How is it biased to have had years of first-hand experience of something visual and then make visual comparisons based upon that experience? I could spend all day having the *opinion* that the vast majority of 109s had red paint on the nose during the Battle of Britain, but that doesn't mean it's either true or should be in the game.

O for gods sake man , my post wasnt aimed at him personally it was aimed at the whole post and all the other threads that are just like it , the same statments keep getting made in ever increasing short tempered terms , every time somone starts a new thread here , I just cringe and wait for the backlashings to start.... its pathetic not personal , do you get it YET.

TheGrunch · #7 03-10-2011, 04:36 PM

No, because that has nothing to do with what happened in this thread. All of the replies were very reasonable, even-tempered explanations up until yours, although I admit it is easy to read whatever tone you want into them on the internet. Oh well, justify it however you want, I'm not bothered, there are other threads with actual content.

minvid · #8 03-10-2011, 04:46 PM

"I ´ve got my opinion, don´t confuse me with facts!!!!"

major_setback · #9 03-10-2011, 04:58 PM

To be honest I think what is bothering people (me) most is the absolute perfect regularity of them.
Here they are straight too, but the edges are a bit irregular, and they appear to fade and even disappear in places (Big picture):

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...T-89-00210.jpg

choctaw111 · #10 03-10-2011, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by major_setback

To be honest I think what is bothering people (me) most is the absolute perfect regularity of them.
Here they are straight too, but the edges are a bit irregular, and they appear to fade and even disappear in places (Big picture):

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...T-89-00210.jpg

Ah yes. Good photos.
A tracer near the end of its burn will flicker sometimes and I had really hoped that this would be included in Cliffs of Dover.
I also hope that the ricochets will be included. Many times when a tracer hits something and bounces off, it will flicker a bit and even change direction in mid air.