Head Tracking with Cliffs of Dover - Page 61

LoBiSoMeM · #**601** 02-25-2011, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adonys

bla-blaing around that FACT is only what it is: mindless mumbling. if that statement is true, and was made by a developer, then, I repeat, NP can be sued by anyone having interest in using a WR interface with that product, on the basis of unfair competition, no matter how many bla-blas will you throw in here on NP's behalf to cover it. just ask any lawyer you want for confirmation about this.

It's a really important point. But the NP's fanboys/employees/trolls will say:

- Proof it!

We can just speculate why Oleg and team are so afraid to write a letter about the subject... NP is just a small company that helps people with disabilities... NP is like Mother Teresa of Calcutta!

Gimme a break...

Wolf_Rider · #**602** 02-25-2011, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adonys

bla-blaing around that FACT is only what it is: mindless mumbling. if that statement is true, and was made by a developer, then, I repeat, NP can be sued by anyone having interest in using a WR interface with that product, on the basis of unfair competition, no matter how many bla-blas will you throw in here on NP's behalf to cover it. just ask any lawyer you want for confirmation about this.

back to page (about) 5....

that would depend on how the interface was constructed, also your lawyer would ask; what proof have you?
Now what do you think the reaction would be?

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

Yes I have. If you are so stupid that can't understand, isn't my fault.

Everybody with a functional brain understood how FreeTrackClient.dll can provide HT data to any aplication.

You still stuck with "mouse look" and "hack". You even can't understand that. Sorry if you are that stupid, I can't do anything about that.

what, in the application receives the data??

LoBiSoMeM · #**603** 02-25-2011, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

what, in the application receives the data??

Whatever the software dev want. You can do anything with the provided data.

What's your stupid point now? You want that I describes how any game implement HT?

Wolf_Rider · #**604** 02-25-2011, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

You want that I describes how any game implement HT?

just ArmAII if you like

LoBiSoMeM · #**605** 02-25-2011, 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

just ArmAII if you like

You talk like you know a lot. Talk about or go to hell. ASAP.

swiss · #**606** 02-26-2011, 12:34 AM

If it really was unfair competition, you would have to sue the devs, not NP.
Unless np forced them to remove the interface - and here we go, no one can prove.

Just out of curiosity, if CoD only supports TIR, what are you going to do, lobi?

Stipe · #**607** 02-26-2011, 03:39 AM

Ask Oleg if they can include freetrack dll in the future patch, and if not, why not?

Sauf · #**608** 02-26-2011, 03:56 AM

I have no personal interest in this topic, but as i read all the topics whilst drinking my morning coffee I have followed its progress (or lack thereof). In this pic from another topic Luthier seems to have all sorts of HOTAS stuff in the background and it looks to me that he has 2 devices attached to the top of his monitor one being TR, also in another pic you can see a webcam attached but im not sure if its inbuilt to monitor as i have sweet f#%k all knowledge about em. Im sure as developers they would try as many devices as possible for compatability, and being a niche there are not that many ( Im jealous, he has a warthog)

original article with more pics
http://spread-wings.ru/index.php?opt...d=371&Itemid=1

PS, What a way to make a living, couldnt think of a better job if i tried, only down side is you would have to read these forums, but they probarly get the tech who stuffed up to do that as punishment

LoBiSoMeM · #**609** 02-26-2011, 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swiss

Just out of curiosity, if CoD only supports TIR, what are you going to do, lobi?

I'll bother 1C a lot, with new topics, polls, etc. Will try - as we made with BIS - that they support FreeTrackClient.dll interface.

And if someone in the world find a workaround to make Freetrack works in IL-2:CoD, I'll use it without regreat and any trace of "moral concern', until 1C give native support.

But I really know what I'm not gonna do: buy some NP crap to fly in IL-2:CoD, because is EXACTLY what NP wants.

Wolf_Rider · #**610** 02-26-2011, 08:26 AM

why not just remove the NP access by FT and present a clean package?