![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Im climbing and at low speed. The 109 has a little more energy. For a chance to hit it i have to get up the nose a bit more. So i extend the flaps. It's a risky maneuver. If you have energy enough to hit the 109 it's ok, or you will become an easy target dangling. Sorry for my bad english Last edited by EAF51/155_TonyR; 02-22-2011 at 10:34 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Generally a high-wing aircraft will pitch up after deploying landing flaps, whilst a low-wing aircraft, will pitch down, even if the aircraft actually gains altitude from this. I only base this on my aerodynamics education from the airforce.. Maybe somebody else can back me up more on this. Edit: nvm here: http://www.key.aero/view_feature.asp...ection=general Quoted from article : " After several graceful, sweeping turns, I slowly reduced power, lowered the undercarriage and dropped the flaps. As John had indicated, there is a marked pitch down with flap selection, and also significant deceleration. " "Abeam the numbers, I pulled the power back to minus four on the boost gauge, waited for the speed to drop below 140mph, then lowered the flaps and added some more nose-up trim before curving back towards the runway." I think it speaks that spifire had flaps ONLY intended for Landing Purposes! I read somewhere that some versions of the seafire had 3 settings, UP, TakeOff and Landing to reduce the excessive drag on takeoff from carriers when previously using "Landing" flaps ![]() Hope this answers your questions! Last edited by Strike; 02-21-2011 at 10:08 PM. |
![]() |
|
|