Freetrack interface use in IL-2:CoD

[norulz]

Originally Posted by swiss

File a claim, or stfu.

Now that's a statement...

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by norulz

Now that's a statement...

Don't bother anymore, norulz. The level of discussion and knowledge here is really low.

I'm out. Too much stupidity. 1C do whatever they want, they even bother to came here to clarify some points, just to know opinions about some engine flame or make statements about Oleg ocupation...

Let's see what happens in the release of IL-2:CoD...

[swiss]

Originally Posted by norulz

Now that's a statement...

this thread is only about two things:

• would it be legal to make CoD TIR-only compatible?
  Obviously no one here can tell for sure. Sending a letter to whoever is charge will result in a positive or negative replay. So, until we proof, this is all speculating (& bs'ing) about a phantom.
  
  
• Would a TIR-only release affect sales? Again, this thread/poll was unable to provide answers.

Rem:
Last but not least, we're discussing a worst case $150 investment here. Holy cow!
To play the game with descent graphics you'll need a $300 GPU and a $200 CPU.

[norulz]

You go build a CPU... while I go drink my beer.



I think I was wrong though about one think... that NP uses just one "account" to give us nausea...


So... I'm out for drinks too... maybe that is you purpose of linving as NP [s]trolls[/s] PR agents.

[swiss]

lol

[SEE]

In case you are unaware, vote in 'Mysticpumas' IL2forum Poll (link in his opening post) for the inclusion of 6DOF in Stock. Not directly about FT v TIR but the poll includes use of 'alternatives' to TIR.

[Wolf_Rider]

and most there voted for the inclusion of cockpit modelling that wasn't set for the full 6DoF which will open up another can of worms, that being graphic anomolies.. gaps and missing bits.
It is a completely different poll as determined by its criteria, not a poll for the inclusion of alternative headtrackers per se.


Swiss,

"would it be legal to make CoD TIR-only compatible?
Obviously no one here can tell for sure. Sending a letter to whoever is charge will result in a positive or negative replay. So, until we proof, this is all speculating (& bs'ing) about a phantom.

its been banging on for a bit over two years now

[SEE]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

It is a completely different poll as determined by its criteria, not a poll for the inclusion of alternative headtrackers per se.

Urm?.....never said it was! But the vote shows some interesting data none the less regards 'system' usage and I am sure that everyone with 'headtracking' has an opinion as to its inclusion in Stock. Simply pointing out that they can express/vote ref 6DOF in stock- just in case they missed that thread you understand. But of course, little bits of 'other' data can also be gleaned.........

But me thinks you don't like one particular set of results from the headtracking community of a different forum, no suprises there W-R!

[robtek]

There is also a offspring poll here:
http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/t...3/m/2051024119
where one can see that TIR vs FT equals about 10 to 1.

[Wolf_Rider]

my reference was to the poll Puma raised, which you pointed out...

Originally Posted by SEE

In case you are unaware, vote in 'Mysticpumas' IL2forum Poll (link in his opening post) for the inclusion of 6DOF in Stock. Not directly about FT v TIR but the poll includes use of 'alternatives' to TIR.

whereas you may also be trying to be refer to Bearcat's survey on the UBI forum.


The thing you seem to be not aware of See, is no-one really is against the inclusion of alternative headtracking... this has been the consensus since very early in the piece.
Its the way some alternative headtracking go about what they do, which is the problem.