Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Controls threads

Controls threads Everything about controls in CoD

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 02-15-2011, 05:53 AM
norulz norulz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 75
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt View Post
... W-R has calmed down and it seems he's not opposed to having a free head tracking alternative, he's just opposed to using the hacked NP dll...
The same NP says... but not before making that dll the only one devs use so the alternatives have no alternative.

Some in face of monopoly don't give a darn about "meanings" of fighting it... Is not "ethical"? Monopoly is not ethical either.

That dll was used cause it was available... NP seeing their position attacked induced the idea that the "gate", the interface the programs give headtracking solutions to the game is the main problem... and since their dll was in used at that time they locked it then convinced devs to use only their own encrypted "gate". Thus... forcing the others to take "other" route. Then complaining...

If a game is including all the interfaces available... and adds them as they are getting born by necessity then NP knows they have no chance. No one would give them 180$ on some fancy webcam with a chip when they could do the same with a 20$ webcam and the enormous (by the day) CPU power they already have.

Especially... when the alternative does not lock the client into a money milking product line, gives more options to the user and works better in general.


The problem is not that darn dll... As it is neither that darn "tracking clip". NP could still sell their 3point clip that works ok with FT but they know they cannot have a bussiness with just that 2$ clip sold to 40$ when that can be made if necessary by "Chinese" for 1$. Sure it can be made in house also... but it is meaningless to the issue.

Isn't it nice that you don't have to buy a mouse from just one manufacturer? Would you like to have same discussion about the "huge" effort went into developing the pathetic mouse interface? How about Joysticks? Or audiocards...


So...

NP TIR does their calculations by a chip and software
FT does its calculations only by software and is different, more complex in options and free.... opened also.

The interfaces

NP locked theirs
FT is free
(other interfaces exists)

Devs use only NP interface...


problem.


That is the issue of this thread.

Last edited by norulz; 02-15-2011 at 05:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.