Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-30-2011, 07:54 AM
Antoninus Antoninus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 141
Default

I hope MS has learned their lesson after all the turmoil created with the faked FSX DX10 screenshots. FSX with a couple of third party add ons can looks almost as good the new Flight screenshots, so I expect that they are real this time. Some in the community already expressed their disappointment that the progress in visuals between Flight and FSX won't be as big as they anticipated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-30-2011, 08:51 PM
highness highness is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 85
Default

i doubt that new MS Flightsimulator will be a threat to il-2, since it is mostly based on general aviation with POOR and nearly unexisting simulation, it is aimed at general public audience and the major "luring in" effect is the beautiful environment and graphics (which is an important sell out factor for a commercial game)

Last edited by highness; 01-30-2011 at 08:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-31-2011, 05:03 PM
maclean525 maclean525 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 95
Default

OK, so there are two possibilities here. Either everyone posting in this thread that IL-2 looks better are being paid to say it by Steve Jobs or they are legally blind. These screen shots look wonderful, what's the issue?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-31-2011, 06:11 PM
Chivas Chivas is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maclean525 View Post
OK, so there are two possibilities here. Either everyone posting in this thread that IL-2 looks better are being paid to say it by Steve Jobs or they are legally blind. These screen shots look wonderful, what's the issue?
Microsoft has a history of false advertising and very crappy graphics down low and away from any airfield. I do like the the screenshots, but I would be very very very skeptical on their quality at low level.

Microsoft does a great job on takeoff procedures, climb to 10,000ft and navigate to your destination, but if you like low level site seeing forget about it, unless you spend a tidy some on all the third party terrain updates. Either way it would probably soon get boring if your primarily a combat flight sim pilot. Although I never had time to get bored with FSX as it was so damn ugly down low I quit flying it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-31-2011, 06:12 PM
mazex's Avatar
mazex mazex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maclean525 View Post
OK, so there are two possibilities here. Either everyone posting in this thread that IL-2 looks better are being paid to say it by Steve Jobs or they are legally blind. These screen shots look wonderful, what's the issue?
Mmm, the reason for me being pessimistic is that it is obvious that Flight is just FSX with some tweaks, and FSX looks good at some places high up, but looks like crap on most places down low. To make my point I fired up FSX Acceleration right now and took two "ms web site" shots (no addons) and one "the real FSX shot" at Ultra everything settings (all settings at max accept cloud range at 30%)

Here we have Grand Canyon in dawn... I sure could find a better place and more dramatic sunset if I put more than five minutes to it. Just searched Grand Canyon and took off and took the shot.


EDIT: OK, I put in five more minutes and took off from Honolulu in sunset:


And here we have the "white" cliffs of Dover down low...


Most places you fly look like Dover, but the screenies look like Grand Canyon or Honolulu - that's my point!

Anyone want to discuss the palette or the selection of spruce trees and Large multifloor buildings in the Kent countryside? The color of the cliffs anyone?

Yes, I know they cover the whole world and then it gets like this...

EDIT: Yes I forgot the mapping for the darn brakes, in FSX it's no problem taking off with full brakes in a tail dragger anyway

EDIT again - the people complaining about the CoD beta shots being too green maybe want something like this? (could not resist it )

Last edited by mazex; 01-31-2011 at 07:44 PM. Reason: Edited to avoid paranoid filters
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-31-2011, 06:17 PM
speculum jockey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mazex View Post
And here we have the "white" cliffs of Dover down low...
Could you rehost the second pic, I'm not seeing it.

My office is blocking it due to the file name I think. It's saying it's porn. Probably something to do with "xdover" thinking "bend over" manybe?

Last edited by speculum jockey; 01-31-2011 at 06:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-31-2011, 09:07 PM
The Kraken The Kraken is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 317
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by speculum jockey View Post
Could you rehost the second pic, I'm not seeing it.

My office is blocking it due to the file name I think. It's saying it's porn. Probably something to do with "xdover" thinking "bend over" manybe?
Probably a safety measure: that image can cause eye cancer...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-31-2011, 06:18 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

lol, nice cliffs, I really dig those 2d trees too.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-31-2011, 06:28 PM
Chivas Chivas is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,769
Default

It just doesn't get any uglier than those FSX cliffs of dover, tree, and quagmire terrain textures. It will be easy for MS Flight to do a better job, but I'm not holding my breath.

Last edited by Chivas; 01-31-2011 at 06:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-31-2011, 09:42 PM
mazex's Avatar
mazex mazex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katana1000S View Post
As has been said before MS have always shown screenshot's of their forthcoming sim that are nowhere to be seen in the finished version, only they could get away with this

Remember the image they claimed was from their DX10 version of FSX, it turned out to be an artists interpretation, but it was claimed at the time as the real deal and how it was necessary to buy the then new Vista to enjoy DX10 like this ... fool me once shame on me, fool me twice ... we all know the drill

Their dodgy practises made the Inquirer ...

http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/...eading-picture

Judge for yourself ...

The Inq has been my favorite site for many years They must have loved this "open goal" groin kick at "the vole"...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.