![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
You would prefer paying for every single flyable instead of having a bunch of them for free, because they "take up space"? LOL
Now that's something really important to take notice of. A few megs of harddrive space in a game that takes 4+ gigs.... |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well LOL to you too, of what use are free bees when no one needs and uses them? Mind explaining? Yes I would pay if that would garantie that needed aircraft make it into the sim yes! As what missions is anyone going to make with those UFOs we got stuffed in on the 1946 dvd? Have you seen them on any servers after the first year 1946 came out? I doubt it! So LoL to you, if you can not see the point.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
You speak too much from your own point of view. I know plenty of guys that enjoys the odd aircrafts in the 1946 expansion on occasion, myself included, so stating that "noone uses them" is plain wrong. If you want a real challenge, try landing a Lerche. Last edited by kimosabi; 01-16-2011 at 08:16 PM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() Going by that logic one could then add something like this into RO2
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I think you're forgetting that it is a game. If anyone that plays it for fun is a kid, then so be it!! Nice toilet. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
i like lerche because not is fantasy but is real project not terminated and not developed i like if also insert in il-2 another luft46 airplane in the different category "alternative war" a like if also insert secret german armament super tank or HANAEBU or the CARRIER ZEPPELIN or CARRIER AQUILA in the different category.
il-2 game have different tipe of category realistic storic fantasy or acrobatic or race i like look the game to all 360° degreeds point of view. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Il-2 will be an amazing game still for several years. About Cliffs, i will buy it for sure as soon as there's a downloadable version available (i'm from Uruguay). Since Il-2 covers so many different theatres, i don't think they will be in direct competition in many of them, not until the new generation of sims is a lot more developed.
__________________
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
IL2 will stay in my hard drive for many years for sure.
Sometimes I need to fly my beloved IAR81!! Or the mighty Tupolev. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Speaking for myself and the couple of dozen people that I fly regularly with I can't imagine any of us instantly deleting IL-2. You can be sure that we'll be giving the new sim a good go, but I don't see it being a case of never flying an I-16 in the Khalkin Gol again; or any of the other favourites that we enjoy on a regular basis every week. Perhaps if the new sim is so far ahead that it makes all the other stuff seem tired we might give it an honourable retirement - but with so many things still happening in IL-2 I can't see it falling out of the zone for a few years yet.
B
__________________
Another home-built rig: AMD FX 8350, liquid-cooled. Asus Sabretooth 990FX Rev 2.0 , 16 GB Mushkin Redline (DDR3-PC12800), Enermax 1000W PSU, MSI R9-280X 3GB GDDR5 2 X 128GB OCZ Vertex SSD, 1 x64GB Corsair SSD, 1x 500GB WD HDD. CH Franken-Tripehound stick and throttle merged, CH Pro pedals. TrackIR 5 and Pro-clip. Windows 7 64bit Home Premium. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I will only fly CoD exclusively, that's if it's half as good as advertised. I just can't imagine IL-2 competing for my limited time. Time marches on, no sense wasteing it with a great, but old school tired sim, with a crazy on-line mix.
__________________
GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5 |
![]() |
|
|