![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I must be honest :
BF 109 – maybe OK ![]() FW190 – ??? ![]() FW 190´s taxing power ??? ![]() something go very badly I must use prop pitch.... Auto OFF…. every time I love the P-40's But…. porcelain engine ??? ![]() Last edited by Mustang; 01-02-2011 at 12:57 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As you can probably tell by my sig pic, I am a huge fan of the Curtiss Hawk series of fighters.
The Hawk 81 through 87 series (P40 to P 40N) were robust aircraft which made them very well suited to the fighter/bomber role that they eventually fell into. The Allison V-1710 12 cylinder engine was probably the toughest inline engine of the war. So much so that even today, the unlimited class air racers that run Merlin engines almost all use the connecting rods from the Allison V-1710 because they are so much stronger than the Rolls-Royce rods are. Do we see this reflected in the sim? Hardly. One rifle caliber hit ahead of the leading edge of the wings and the engine is either stopped instantly, or barely able to make power above idle speed. And the airframe itself leaves something to be desired. The wings are pretty strong, but fuselage hits always cut multiple control cables (true for many types in game and no doubt reflects the 9 year old+ game engine). Sorry, I can't stop myself when it comes to my favorite aircraft of all time.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It wouldn't bother me really if the difference isn't this huge. BTW send me some of whatever the topic starter is on, I could use some ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do not forget, Focke Wulf had RADIAL engine. Yes, the difference is HUGE.
Last edited by Ernst; 01-02-2011 at 11:12 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Rifle caliber one shot insta-stop of the engine is quite common. Also happens to the F6F. And then we have the overheating problems that the air cooled radials have in this sim, which is utter nonsense.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes i flied a P-47 and the engine is difficult to stop. Obviously, the engine is not indestructible. Even Focke Wulf engine. About the overheating i agree. Even at high speeds the engine cooling is not good. I have no data to show the engine cooling is wrong, but at medium-high speeds i believe the engine cooling is better in radial ones and in game some inline engines cool much more easy.
I am not necessarily disagree but some data will make you much more truthfull. Last edited by Ernst; 01-03-2011 at 01:13 AM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
other air cooled engines in game are defiantly not so fortunate, for sure though. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I haven't experienced a insta-stop P-47 engine in a long time. It used to be there and be quite common to the point that it was utterly insane to even think about taking a bit of damage in a P-47 as you'd know that you would have a tough airframe surrounded by a dead engine. But that was a while ago.. Now the P-47 is probably the hardest single engine fighter to bring down. And rightly so!
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
![]() |
|
|