![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which is historically CORRECT for most of the aircraft in game.
Allowing Cessna style differential braking for all aircraft would not be historical, though of course a FEW major aircraft modeled DID have the two toe brakes, it was a new innovation at the time and only appeared on a few aircraft. Ideally of course we should have toe brakes for the aircraft that had them historically and a single brake control for the rest. that however is probably unnecessarily complex. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is by no means a priority request but it does appear that there are a few aircraft that are incorrectly armed. There may be good reasons for this but I wanted to pose the question.
My focus is on the Yak-9UT which there is unfortunately not very many resources out there on. The in-game version has a pair of ShVAK 20mm cannons in the nose and a single 37mm cannon in the hub mount which IL-2 Compare lists as Sh37ki. Although difficult to track details... we *think* that the correct armament should be two B-20S cannons in the nose (instead of the ShVAK) and one NS-23 cannon in the hub mount. The discussion that we had was here: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=17554 Also that indicates that there are a number of other types with incorrect armament. The Ki-43-II has Browning .50cals when they probably should be the same Ho103 as in the Ki-61 and Ki-100. The J2M3 and M5 aren't quite right either. I didn't know some of this until just recently. References difficult but some are probably more obvious than others.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If it's possible, it should be attempted IMHO. Not top priority, but someday in another patch?
|
![]() |
|
|