What looks best for IL2 (& therefore SoW) - 3 22" screens, or 1 27"?

[TeeJay82]

ill take One 27 in 1900*1200" over 3 22 1900*1080" any day

[maclean525]

You know you hear a lot of "I don't think 3 screens would be better" what you never hear, however, is someone with three screens saying that a single screen is better

Bottom line, once you go three screens you will never, ever go back to single screen. It is so much better words don't even come close to describing it.

I have three 23" Dell monitors with the sides arranged at 45 degrees. I sit 24" from the middle screen and the two side monitors are very close to filling my peripheral vision.

[BigC208]

I just ordered new parts for a computer with a 980x and 3 gtx580 for multimonitor simming. Right now I have 3x22 screens and am contemplating 3x27,1080p or 3x30. 3x27,1080p makes more sense financially and it pushes less pixels. On the other hand monitors last a long time. Good chance that the next generation graphics cards will run 3x30 at 2560 by 1600 without any hiccups. It also looks like 30 inch 2560x1600 monitors are not going to get below $1000 any time soon so they keep their value long term. I've seen a guy on the simhq forum that runs 3x30 monitors with gtx580 dualsli in portrait mode. If his setup runs CoD ok I'll go that way. Otherwise I'll go 3x27 in portrait mode. No need to spend $3500 for a CoD slide show.

If I were you though (budget wise) I would just get 2 more 22 inch screens and run it of one 6970. Cheapest solution. My 3x22 1680x1050 monitors are pretty imersive. Let me give you one advice. See if if you find someone with a multimonitor setup and fly RoF or Il2 for a while with track ir. Been reading a lot about people with motion sickness issues... My wife just gets sick standing behind me in RoF dogfighting on 3 monitors and track ir. I myself had to get used to it. Using also trackir I had to slow down my headmovements. If I need to look 90 degrees left I just glance left to my angled left monitor and only slightly move my head with track ir. Big movements off the normal axis feel unatural. This also happens on a single screen but really gets amplified on a multimonitor setup.

[Triggaaar]

Originally Posted by FS~Phat

I have a 25.5" 1920x1200 and 3x 24" 1920x1080 and the 3x24" eats the 25".

Well that's not a fair comparison. 3 22" is not as good as 3 24", and 1 27" is better than 1 25".

Originally Posted by BigC208

Good chance that the next generation graphics cards will run 3x30 at 2560 by 1600 without any hiccups.

What, one card? They won't run a modern game at that res. The best cards can run 1 screen at that res with high settings, but next gen GCs won't be twice as fast as the current cards, but they'd need to be to run 3 screens.

It also looks like 30 inch 2560x1600 monitors are not going to get below $1000 any time soon so they keep their value long term.

As 3D becomes the more standard, and average screen size continues to increase, those monitors will get cheaper. It never ceases to amaze me how large TVs just keep getting cheaper and cheaper.

If I were you though (budget wise) I would just get 2 more 22 inch screens and run it of one 6970. Cheapest solution. My 3x22 1680x1050 monitors are pretty imersive.

Well I did get a 6970 for a fair price. Hopefully we'll soon be finding out how well that can run BoB (CoD etc), and whether it could run either 3 screens or 1 at 2560 x 1600.

Let me give you one advice. See if if you find someone with a multimonitor setup and fly RoF or Il2 for a while with track ir. Been reading a lot about people with motion sickness issues... My wife just gets sick standing behind me in RoF dogfighting on 3 monitors and track ir. I myself had to get used to it. Using also trackir I had to slow down my headmovements. If I need to look 90 degrees left I just glance left to my angled left monitor and only slightly move my head with track ir. Big movements off the normal axis feel unatural. This also happens on a single screen but really gets amplified on a multimonitor setup.

No chance of finding a friend as geeky as us lot, but interesting point, thanks.