|
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
10-18-2010, 11:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
So we have here:
- experts of WWII fields - experts of BOB country colors - experts of RAF flight goggles - experts of flight suits - experts of clouds (not so many thou ...  )- experts of 110 antennas - experts of locomotives - ... I can continue ... Chapeau ... personally I just want an honest combat flight simulation and I feel so lonely ! Hey anyone else out there like me ? ;D 
|
|
#2
10-18-2010, 11:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Seriously, some of u people need to take a biig step back and start living.
Jesus H..... Edit: from another forum, im suprised noone has commentet on the wrong type of rooftiling used in olegs screens. Im sure though someone will be here shortly doing just that. Flight sim community just blows my mind over and over again. (not in a good way mind u) Last edited by Baron; 10-18-2010 at 11:22 PM.
|
|
#3
10-18-2010, 11:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
With respect, these things are a lot more obvious than a darn roofing slate. They literally shout MODERN TECHNOLOGY BELOW. Now, it may not seem important to many but just wait until people start producing the historically accurate movies that Oleg hinted at. It was bad enough watching Memphis Belle with all those modern fields in the background. If Oleg has a chance to make the environment historically correct then I think he will choose to do it, I don't care when.
|
|
#4
10-18-2010, 11:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
These are little details but they do matter. What is the point of Oleg getting the buildings, boundaries and roads of 1940s Britain bang on when 1000s of acres of agricultural land proves that this is in fact a modern landscape? Kind of kills the illusion I'd say. All we're talking about is making the cereal textures plain instead of tramlined, that's all. I bet there's only about 5 textures to change. Last edited by Sutts; 10-18-2010 at 11:28 PM.
|
|
#5
10-18-2010, 11:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
i think ALL of us want that Insuber, IL2 is with out doubt the best sim(or game for that matter) that ive ever owned.
We all prob have 1000s of hours flying IL2 thanks to Oleg, i know i have. And we all want the best for SOW, now if some of us spot things that we think could be closer to the real thing, then why not point them out? Now if Oleg then agrees and changes these small things then whats the harm? If he doesnt agree or hasnt time to change them, thats his choice, its his sim, he can and will do what he feels is right, its not going to make any of us not buy the game.
|
|
#6
10-18-2010, 11:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
10-19-2010, 09:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
No problem in principle furbs, if we were in an ideal world with unlimited time and money. Maybe I'm wrong but I'm just a bit afraid of the disproportioned influence of noisy minorities, whose priorities are very far from those of the vast majority of the aficionados. In short: the perfect is the enemy of the good, as Voltaire put it 250 years ago. Have a nice day, Insuber
|
|
#8
10-19-2010, 10:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Well said, i totally agree. In a few words, before give us the Double decker with drivers included, please give us England. P.S.: We'll have different landscape (textures) for France and England? Last edited by 150GCT_Veltro; 10-19-2010 at 02:35 PM.
|
|
#9
10-19-2010, 12:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
10-19-2010, 12:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just an observation as a former freelance photographer.
Many of the photos people are preferring as "more correct" have clearly been taken with a polarized lens. Polarised lenses with landscape photos give a more dramatic result. From an observers point of view the effect on the image is similar to putting on a pair of high quality sunglasses on a sunny day.
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
