![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
it's not like the b29 is a rare plane, is it?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
True we do have Fifi flying again.
One airworthy should be enough, we shouldn't get greedy ![]() Last edited by WTE_Galway; 10-01-2010 at 12:45 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
and e-gay.
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Enola Gay is not likely to be ever airworthy AFAIK
Although there was an April Fool's hoax at one stage claiming it was doing a flight across America. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why do they need to be airworthy at all?
They are ok an display in a "potential airworthy" status. Since they are rare, why put them at risk of frequent flying? Ok, it's probably just me. ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Because museums full of static displays of gutted aircraft that just look good from a distance is equivalent to replacing all the live animals in a zoo with stuffed ones ![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
When was the last time you've seen an elephant ditch? ![]() [we don't have to discuss having running engines, I'd love to see/hear them] |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not a chance in the world. It's on display in the D.C. area.
One could only imagine the protests that would happen if they even thought about flying it again. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nothing like monday morning quarterbacking from the armchair
![]() |
![]() |
|
|