Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-02-2010, 10:19 PM
fireflyerz fireflyerz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: All over the world...
Posts: 417
Default

Yup...keep smokin that one boy...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-03-2010, 09:31 AM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fireflyerz View Post
Yup...keep smokin that one boy...

LOL
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-03-2010, 11:26 AM
Baron Baron is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
LOL

Patting eachother on the back in every other post really doesnt get u points on the credometer.

Grow up.

How about taking nonecentiall member bashing to PM instead of cluttering a update treadh with this unbelivebly unintresting drivel.

Last edited by Baron; 09-03-2010 at 11:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-03-2010, 11:43 AM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Sorry

Last edited by philip.ed; 09-03-2010 at 12:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-03-2010, 12:03 PM
NNFFL=Clovis= NNFFL=Clovis= is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6
Default

How can you expect Oleg or Luthier to answer some of the very interesting questions asked with all the c... you are throwing at each other polluting this thread?

Hope it will not discourage Oleg of posting new updates as well.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-03-2010, 12:16 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

I agree. But I think they have too much work to do to answer all our questions. If we look over recent updates, clearly the only questions that get answered are ones that are interesting to the team.
Either way, we should count ourselves lucky to get updates.

And I will apologise again for having my rant; it is intolerable. But clearly I spoke on behalf of a few members on the forum.

Anyway; this is all virtual so non-one was hurt

And just to say that I edited all my posts before to apologise.

Last edited by philip.ed; 09-03-2010 at 12:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-03-2010, 12:22 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Well, back on topic somewhat...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldschool61 View Post
Do you sit on your instruments??Last I checked most guages are in front of the pilot not under the seat. Next time your driving look down and see if your seat is empty, I'll bet you see something besides your empty seat.
And looking down in the pit and NOT seeing a torso and legs on rudder pedals does detract from immersion a bit. How is that going to prevent you from reading gauges? Most of the stuff you need to see is high enough above the flight stick that its not an issue. If this sim is going to be realistic in first person mode you need to see your body in pit. Anything less is unrealistic. Hell most first person shooters do this.
Well, in many planes cockpits are cramped and in others some instruments are tucked away in some funny places, for example fuel gauges in P-51s. While i agree that seeing our own virtual body would add to immersion somewhat, there are practical problems as well. I also agree that having a pilot body that is totally still is worse than having none at all.

For example, bear in mind that due to the increased amount of realism there needs to be an increased amount of controls as well. Since most people have a HOTAS and keyboard at best and not custom-made simpits, the decision was made to allow the use of clickable cockpit switches in order to cut down on the amount of keyboard/button controls needed to operate the aircraft. A virtual pilot body in the cockpit would seriously hinder the use of that, forcing you to bind, memorize and use large numbers of keyboard shortcuts for things that are probably only used sparingly throughout the mission (so they don't have to be bound directly to keyboard/HOTAS), but still need to be operated.

Case in point, things like bomb selection/release panels and side consoles/electric controls panels. For example, in a P47 half of the electric controls switches would be obscured by the pilot's left leg if he was modelled in the cockpit. You need those switches to actually start the plane up but won't need them again until you land and shut everything down, so the obvious solution would be to not bind them to keyboard or stick buttons but operate them with the mouse once at the start and once before the end of the mission. If there was a pilot modelled in the cockpit, the view would be blocked and you'd have to bind them to keys/buttons.

I wouldn't mind seeing a pilot, but if he was interfering with controls there should be an on/off toggle switch or transparency option when hovering the cursor over him.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.