Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-24-2010, 12:02 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hecke View Post
i post again.


Do the bullet cases damage other planes by hitting them?
Why? Should they? Did they? What kind of damage? Do you have proof?

Other than possible take a chip out of a wood prop, I can only think of jammed cowl flaps, or maybe reduce cooling(because they block the radiator).




A *ping* sound when they hit your aircraft would be quite cool though.
  #2  
Old 07-24-2010, 12:10 PM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!

Swiss, hitting a shell case at speeds above 300km/h can make more damage than just a ping If you drive a car at 80km/h and a small piece of rock hits your window or paint job there is usually some damage. And we talk about smaller pieces and less speed. So I would figure flying through a cloud of shell casings is not very desireable. But again modeling this..hmm..not adding anything to the sim.
  #3  
Old 07-24-2010, 12:17 PM
Hecke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

but when a whole load of shell castings hits the prop i think that has a huge effect on it.
  #4  
Old 07-24-2010, 12:19 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanker35M View Post
S!

Swiss, hitting a shell case at speeds above 300km/h can make more damage than just a ping If you drive a car at 80km/h and a small piece of rock hits your window or paint job there is usually some damage. And we talk about smaller pieces and less speed. So I would figure flying through a cloud of shell casings is not very desireable. But again modeling this..hmm..not adding anything to the sim.
If the cases are from your wingman, the have pretty much the same, if you hit your enemy's during a head on - well...

Don't know.
If they indeed caused damage there would be reports about it.
Are there?

Quote:
but when a whole load of shell castings hits the prop i think that has a huge effect on it.
Stop thinking and bring proof, otherwise STFU.

BTW: "Castings" would really cause some bad ass damage, lol.

Last edited by swiss; 07-24-2010 at 12:30 PM.
  #5  
Old 07-24-2010, 12:43 PM
Feuerfalke Feuerfalke is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanker35M View Post
S!

Swiss, hitting a shell case at speeds above 300km/h can make more damage than just a ping If you drive a car at 80km/h and a small piece of rock hits your window or paint job there is usually some damage. And we talk about smaller pieces and less speed. So I would figure flying through a cloud of shell casings is not very desireable. But again modeling this..hmm..not adding anything to the sim.
1. a piece of rock is solid, a case is not - it's deformable.
2. your windscreen is most likely not armored to withstand birdstrike or small arms fire.
3. Your windscreen is reinforced class that is designed to splinter on impact to not cause any large, sharp fragments. A canopy is designed to not splinter.
(If you lose your windscreen at 80km/h you just stop. If you lose it at 500km/h at 30,000ft you're in trouble.)
  #6  
Old 07-24-2010, 12:45 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feuerfalke View Post
2. your windscreen is most likely not armored to withstand birdstrike or small arms fire.
3. Your windscreen is reinforced class that is designed to splinter on impact to not cause any large, sharp fragments. A canopy is designed to not splinter.
(If you lose your windscreen at 80km/h you just stop. If you lose it at 500km/h at 30,000ft you're in trouble.)
Now I'll do some research, I indeed think it was bullet proof glas, several inches thick.
  #7  
Old 07-24-2010, 01:22 PM
Feuerfalke Feuerfalke is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swiss View Post
Now I'll do some research, I indeed think it was bullet proof glas, several inches thick.
Of course it was!

Where did I say something else?
  #8  
Old 07-24-2010, 01:24 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Quote:
2. your windscreen is most likely not armored to withstand birdstrike or small arms fire.
?
  #9  
Old 07-24-2010, 01:42 PM
Feuerfalke Feuerfalke is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swiss View Post
?
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...&postcount=103


You should also check out the posts other people reply to
(Isn't that the idea of quoting posts in your own reply?)



At least "your windscreen" should have given you a hint - well, I assume that neither you nor Flanker 35M drive armored cars?

Last edited by Feuerfalke; 07-24-2010 at 01:51 PM.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.