![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Ju 88 C-6 was probably the closest thing to the A-20. Many were sent to the Eastern Front as "train-busters."
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
First of all, the forward firing armament on the A-20C was seldom used and often removed in the ETO, as it was the major goal to get in fast and out even faster. No sane bomber pilot would have stayed around to strafe targets with weak 0.303...
The next thing is the top speed. In real world action, the A-20 never flew maxed out all the time. Its cruising speed was good, but not outstanding nor setting it apart from its German rivals. So both the Ju88 and especially the Do217E/M versions could do the same job at comparable or better speeds and had the ability to carry nearly twice the load, plus were capable of precision dive bombing. In Il-2, attacking point targets on short range missions, the Bf 110 or Me210/410 are more viable options even. Better forward armament, 1,200kg(2,400lb) of bombs and the ability to actually fight their way out. Last edited by Zorin; 04-22-2010 at 11:17 PM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stuka!
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
However, unrealistic engine limits are something that can be corrected and i'm glad Oleg and team are taking a look at it in SoW. In IL2 everything flies pretty much maxed out all the time. In reality, maximum continuous power is considerably or much lower even for fighter types, for example the 190s are rated for 1.2 ata or thereabouts and the Spits for +8lbs of boost. Contrast this with how we fly in IL2, 190s on WEP and exceeding the 2700RPM limit and Spits at +12 boost or so, all the time. This skews gameplay when compared to real life performance and also creates unrealistic expectations, practices and tactics. A real aircraft flying like we do would be left with its engines seized, burning or at the very least having blown off a couple of cylinder heads due to the extreme pressures and temperatures after 5 minutes or less. It sure is going to be a fun time in SoW, when people left and right start crying that their favorite ride can't attain its documented maximum speed and keep it indefinitely It would be interesting to see what kind of speed difference one gets when running an A20 at rated power as opposed to full power. I would do it but i don't have any of the testing autopilot utilities, but i can supply some numbers for anyone interested. After a quick google search, what comes up from the reprinted USAAF manuals is this: Max. take off power: 45" manifold pressure, 2400 RPM (5 mins only) Max. continuous climb power: 36" MP, 2300 RPM Cruise: 28"-30.9" MP, 1900 RPM That's a full 14" of MP and 500 RPM between flat out full power and maximum cruise EDIT: Forgot the link, here it goes http://books.google.gr/books?id=Cf7n...page&q&f=false Last edited by Blackdog_kt; 04-22-2010 at 11:19 AM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll hop on the 110 bandwagon, as she's hard to beat for ground attack.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good point about the Bf110. I guess that is sort of in a similar range as well... heavy forward armament (like the A-20G) and decent bomb loadouts.
If we did get a Me 210 or a Me 410 officially flyable would it have greater bomb loadouts than the 110?
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, it would not. The loadouts were pretty much the same with regards to bombs.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
177 heavy bomber
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinkel_He_177 Powerplant: 2× Daimler-Benz DB 610 24-cylinder 565 km/h ![]() or Me 262A-2a Sturmvogel http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...262_B1-A_4.jpg
__________________
Core2Quad 9400 2.66Ghz 45nm - 4x2gb ddr2 800 Kingston = 8GBRAM - XFX Radeon HD 5850 Black Edition 1Gb DDR5 765Mhz/1440steam/ 4.5Gbps- 1/2 Terabyte Wn D 32mb - Mother Assus P5QLE - P&C Silencer 750W - Sentey RJA246 LCD 4 coolers - DVD/RW 20x LG - LCD Samsung P2350n 23" - Edifier C2 2.1+1 waiting for: Il-2: Armée de l’Air; Continuation War; Battle for Moscow; Stalingrad; El Alamein; Sicily; The West Air Campaign; Berlin ZakKandrachoff
|
![]() |
|
|