Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > Men of War

Men of War New World War II strategy game

View Poll Results: Best Heavy tank
Kv-1 1 3.03%
Kv-85 0 0%
Tiger 3 9.09%
Panther 6 18.18%
Pershing T-29 2 6.06%
King Tiger 15 45.45%
Centurion 1 3.03%
IS-1 0 0%
IS-2 3 9.09%
IS-3 2 6.06%
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-15-2010, 06:44 PM
FM_Von_Manstein FM_Von_Manstein is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 58
Default

There's no record of the IS-3 ever seeing any real action. All these experimental tanks were added for balancing. If they weren't then Germany would wtf pwn everyone.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-15-2010, 06:46 PM
KnightFandragon KnightFandragon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KRL HQ, Ontario Canada
Posts: 740
Default

And at the end of the day the only super tanks I fear are the IS 3 and the T29. The Cent has no armor and a gun that only dreams of taking out my KIng Tiger and the Chi Ri, well....Ive never played against one b/c no one plays the Japanese. The Pershing is kinda annoying b/c of that 90 but still...it can die
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-15-2010, 06:56 PM
Korsakov829 Korsakov829 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,021
Default

It seems the King Tiger wins the Best Heavy Tank poll.

Can't believe nobody but me likes the KV-1. A reliable heavy tank for sure.

Last edited by Korsakov829; 04-15-2010 at 06:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-15-2010, 07:50 PM
KnightFandragon KnightFandragon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KRL HQ, Ontario Canada
Posts: 740
Default

I wouldnt vote KV-1 but the KV85. The KV1 has good armor but it's F32 or w/e is not that great of a gun......The KV85 has some D5T or w/e and that thing is defintely nice, sure the 85 has less armor but the better gun is definetly a good trade off.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-15-2010, 10:40 PM
FM_Von_Manstein FM_Von_Manstein is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 58
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Korsakov829 View Post
It seems the King Tiger wins the Best Heavy Tank poll.

Can't believe nobody but me likes the KV-1. A reliable heavy tank for sure.
Stupidest thing I have ever heard in my life. The KV-1 was very mechanically unreliable, more than the Tiger in fact. Its only advantage was it's armor, and that became penetrable frontally in 1942. It's poor speed made it an easy target for planes and artillery fire. And it's gun was just average, obsolete by 1942.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-15-2010, 10:57 PM
Korsakov829 Korsakov829 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,021
Default

Bah, it is the most likeable Russian tank from the WWII era. My father drove one through the streets of Berlin, and even though it was later destroyed he and his crew survived Berlin. By that, I call it reliable.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-16-2010, 12:23 AM
FM_Von_Manstein FM_Von_Manstein is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 58
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Korsakov829 View Post
Bah, it is the most likeable Russian tank from the WWII era. My father drove one through the streets of Berlin, and even though it was later destroyed he and his crew survived Berlin. By that, I call it reliable.
No it wasn't, the T-34 was. And I find it hard to believe that the KV-1 was in service in 1945, but hey. Its communist Russia. And even if your father did in fact drive it in Berlin. The tank certainly didn't drive there. The threads would have broken down around Warsaw if he was lucky, chances are it would have been earlier than that.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-16-2010, 10:59 AM
Korsakov829 Korsakov829 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,021
Default

Well, he did fine. At least thats what I'm told.

I don't feel comfortable with using the T-34.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-17-2010, 08:36 PM
Nikitns Nikitns is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FM_Von_Manstein View Post
Stupidest thing I have ever heard in my life. The KV-1 was very mechanically unreliable, more than the Tiger in fact. Its only advantage was it's armor, and that became penetrable frontally in 1942. It's poor speed made it an easy target for planes and artillery fire. And it's gun was just average, obsolete by 1942.
KV2 was NOT unreliable. Sure, it had some mechanical problems due 2 its extreme weight but...

There are accounts of single KV-1's holding off an entire Panzer division (a bridge) and 5 KV-1's ambushing and slaughtering a panzer column. Its gun could kill anything in 1941.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FM_Von_Manstein View Post
Yes. Long barrels have higher muzzle velocity, and therefor better penetration, range and accuracy.

In terms of guns. Muzzle Velocity=Penetration and size=damage done with HE rounds.



I'm pretty sure the armor thickness is correct. T-34/76 and T-34/85 were both pretty weak in terms or armor. Very vulnerable, German 37mm AT guns could penetrate frontal armor under 100m IIRC, and 50mm AT guns at even longer ranges.
Nah, it was impervious of fire from 37mm guns. I don't know about 50mm though I doubt it. The Germans often had 2 use howitzers to take out a T-34/76

I voted for the Centurion. It just has this awesome charm!

Last edited by Nikitns; 04-17-2010 at 08:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-18-2010, 04:56 AM
KnightFandragon KnightFandragon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KRL HQ, Ontario Canada
Posts: 740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikitns View Post
KV2 was NOT unreliable. Sure, it had some mechanical problems due 2 its extreme weight but...

There are accounts of single KV-1's holding off an entire Panzer division (a bridge) and 5 KV-1's ambushing and slaughtering a panzer column. Its gun could kill anything in 1941.
Unreliable basically means its mechanical reliability...the KV was a tank that liked to break down...

Of course it could kill anything in 41......it was shooting Pzr 2's and 3's or those Pzr IV D stubby gun tanks that had melted butter for armor. Much past 42 the KV lost its massive invincibility advantage when the Germans got 75mm long barrel guns and 88's
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.