Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-29-2010, 09:06 AM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Default

The PTO has a major problem ... it's called Northrop - Grumman I won't go into details but this one seriously limits the potential projects to begin with (i.e. TBF and derivates plus most US Navy ships). Not to say the PTO won't be touched at all (i.e. the Slot map will be made official) but ATM there's no "plan" since we are arms-deep into 4.10.
  #2  
Old 03-29-2010, 11:36 AM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Is there a possibility to get working speed and altitude instruments for the bombardier in the g4m (Betty)?
Also in the cockpit i haven't found a correct working speed indicator above 300km/h.
Afaik the IJN used knots to measure airspeed and in knots the airspeed indicator would have the range it should have.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
  #3  
Old 03-29-2010, 12:11 PM
MBot MBot is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by csThor View Post
The PTO has a major problem ... it's called Northrop - Grumman I won't go into details but this one seriously limits the potential projects to begin with (i.e. TBF and derivates plus most US Navy ships). Not to say the PTO won't be touched at all (i.e. the Slot map will be made official) but ATM there's no "plan" since we are arms-deep into 4.10.
It is truly a shame that the Northrop-Grumman "situation" also affects ships and especially the critically important Yorktown class carriers (Yorktown, Enterprise, Hornet). If I remember correctly, there was even once a dev update for PF with WIP screens of the Yorktown.

Still, some nice USN ships might still be possible. A quick wiki search (obviously not a reliable source for such delicate matters) revealed the following shipyards other then Newport News worked on major warships:

New York Naval Shipyard:
- BB-55 North Carolina
- BB-61 Iowa
- BB-63 Missouri

Philadelphia Naval Shipyard
- BB-56 Washington
- BB-62 New Jersey
- BB-64 Wisconsin

Norfolk Naval Shipyard
- BB-60 Alabama

New York Shipbuilding Corporation
- BB-57 South Dakota
- CVL Independence Class

Fore River Shipyard (General Dynamics)
- BB-59 Massachusetts
- CV-7 Wasp


So out of these it might be possible to build at least one fast Battleship (class). The Wasp might be an interesting option. Next to do service in the Med (which seems to be a Daidalos Team pet theater ), it is also very similar to the Yorktown class, though smaller. So it could also act as generic carrier to substitute the Yorktown, Enterprise and Hornet. Of course assuming that General Dynamics are not jerks like NG... With this ships, the USN fleet would already be in pretty good shape.


Anyway, I am looking forward to 4.10 and what what DT has up their sleeves next.

Last edited by MBot; 03-29-2010 at 12:26 PM.
  #4  
Old 03-29-2010, 04:24 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

I believe that most of the shipyards you have listed do indeed fall under the N-G umbrella, owing to decades of mergers and corporate takeovers.

It's really a sad situation.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
  #5  
Old 03-29-2010, 05:47 PM
MBot MBot is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 16
Default

Even the Navy yards? If so this is indeed a sad affair.
  #6  
Old 03-29-2010, 05:59 PM
nearmiss nearmiss is offline
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,687
Default

The wake is visible before the ships at distance, unless the speed of the ship is so slow there is no wake.
  #7  
Old 03-29-2010, 06:02 PM
MBot MBot is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nearmiss View Post
The wake is visible before the ships at distance, unless the speed of the ship is so slow there is no wake.
Yes, thats how it should be. The screen shots above were made while flying away from the ships. So it's not in Il-2.

Last edited by MBot; 03-29-2010 at 06:12 PM.
  #8  
Old 04-01-2010, 04:20 PM
Billfish Billfish is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 91
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by csThor View Post
The PTO has a major problem ... it's called Northrop - Grumman I won't go into details but this one seriously limits the potential projects to begin with (i.e. TBF and derivates plus most US Navy ships). Not to say the PTO won't be touched at all (i.e. the Slot map will be made official) but ATM there's no "plan" since we are arms-deep into 4.10.

Could you possibly comment on whether or not the Ki-61 in the sim is being addressed in any form in 4.10?

K2
__________________
  #9  
Old 04-02-2010, 07:13 AM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Default

AFAIK not yet.
  #10  
Old 04-02-2010, 12:53 PM
Billfish Billfish is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 91
Default

Rgr. Thank you.......pity.

K2
__________________
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.