![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The PTO has a major problem ... it's called Northrop - Grumman I won't go into details but this one seriously limits the potential projects to begin with (i.e. TBF and derivates plus most US Navy ships). Not to say the PTO won't be touched at all (i.e. the Slot map will be made official) but ATM there's no "plan" since we are arms-deep into 4.10.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Is there a possibility to get working speed and altitude instruments for the bombardier in the g4m (Betty)?
Also in the cockpit i haven't found a correct working speed indicator above 300km/h. Afaik the IJN used knots to measure airspeed and in knots the airspeed indicator would have the range it should have.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Still, some nice USN ships might still be possible. A quick wiki search (obviously not a reliable source for such delicate matters) revealed the following shipyards other then Newport News worked on major warships: New York Naval Shipyard: - BB-55 North Carolina - BB-61 Iowa - BB-63 Missouri Philadelphia Naval Shipyard - BB-56 Washington - BB-62 New Jersey - BB-64 Wisconsin Norfolk Naval Shipyard - BB-60 Alabama New York Shipbuilding Corporation - BB-57 South Dakota - CVL Independence Class Fore River Shipyard (General Dynamics) - BB-59 Massachusetts - CV-7 Wasp So out of these it might be possible to build at least one fast Battleship (class). The Wasp might be an interesting option. Next to do service in the Med (which seems to be a Daidalos Team pet theater ![]() Anyway, I am looking forward to 4.10 and what what DT has up their sleeves next. Last edited by MBot; 03-29-2010 at 12:26 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I believe that most of the shipyards you have listed do indeed fall under the N-G umbrella, owing to decades of mergers and corporate takeovers.
It's really a sad situation.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even the Navy yards? If so this is indeed a sad affair.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The wake is visible before the ships at distance, unless the speed of the ship is so slow there is no wake.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, thats how it should be. The screen shots above were made while flying away from the ships. So it's not in Il-2.
Last edited by MBot; 03-29-2010 at 06:12 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Could you possibly comment on whether or not the Ki-61 in the sim is being addressed in any form in 4.10? K2
__________________
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AFAIK not yet.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rgr. Thank you.......pity.
K2
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
|
|