Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-13-2009, 11:44 PM
fuzzychickens fuzzychickens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 259
Default

The cylinder on top of the warthog makes me think it is force sensing because it doesn't look like there is room for gimbals based on where the pivot point is.

So, like the x65, this won't be useful for most prop simmers unless they make the stick move a reasonable amount.

Looks like the CH fighterstick is still the best option on the market until CH gets their civilian warthog stick out.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-14-2009, 04:55 AM
l88bastard l88bastard is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fuzzychickens View Post
The cylinder on top of the warthog makes me think it is force sensing because it doesn't look like there is room for gimbals based on where the pivot point is.

So, like the x65, this won't be useful for most prop simmers unless they make the stick move a reasonable amount.

Looks like the CH fighterstick is still the best option on the market until CH gets their civilian warthog stick out.
Seriously, the CH fighterstick is a piece of crap compared to the logitec G940. The G940 force feedback is simply amazing in IL2.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-14-2009, 05:42 PM
fuzzychickens fuzzychickens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by l88bastard View Post
Seriously, the CH fighterstick is a piece of crap compared to the logitec G940. The G940 force feedback is simply amazing in IL2.
It is nice for FFB and nothing else in my experience. I spent an entire week trying to get the 940 working well enough before returning it, but the dead floppy stick in the center means that I lost accuracy esp when properly trimming out my plane - trying to aim around the center screws everything up.

No matter what FFB setting used on the 940, the CH fighter stick is better where it counts for me, getting bullets into your enemy instead of the other way around.

You can knock the fighter stick for not being fancy, but at least it does what I expect with regards to control inputs. That's better then making a nice buring hole in the ground with fancy FFB effects.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-14-2009, 08:51 PM
l88bastard l88bastard is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fuzzychickens View Post
It is nice for FFB and nothing else in my experience. I spent an entire week trying to get the 940 working well enough before returning it, but the dead floppy stick in the center means that I lost accuracy esp when properly trimming out my plane - trying to aim around the center screws everything up.

No matter what FFB setting used on the 940, the CH fighter stick is better where it counts for me, getting bullets into your enemy instead of the other way around.

You can knock the fighter stick for not being fancy, but at least it does what I expect with regards to control inputs. That's better then making a nice buring hole in the ground with fancy FFB effects.
Funny, I am 10x more precise with the G940 and I had a year with the CH fighterstick. I dont' know what deadzone you are talking about, but the center of my G940 is very small and I can make all kinds of precise micro adjustments before any kind of FFB gets in the way (just like a real plane).

The CH stick is loose, sloppy and very toylike. It gave me no aid in putting holes in the enemy and it could care less if I was about to stall, because it never gave me any kind of heads up.

Don't even get me started on the throttle and pedals. IMHO the CH sticks are the most over rated piece of hardware periphal that I have ever used and saying that they are the best because of their build quality is like praising a for pinto that is guaranteed to last for 20 years of driving
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-14-2009, 08:59 PM
AdMan AdMan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Oleg's ignore list
Posts: 247
Default

vowed never to buy a thrustmaster product again after purchasing one of their gamepads. My Saitek works just fine and has HOTAS and great force feedback
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-14-2009, 09:23 PM
Chivas Chivas is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,769
Default

I never liked the CH flight sticks much because of the clunky gimbals made accurate shooting while maneuvering difficult. Well the G940 is 10X worse. G940 electric centering ,forcefeeback, and very week tension around the center makes the CH stick feel smooth. Your constantly having to change input force drastically, making accurate shooting very difficult. Hopefully a patch will be able smooth out the rough edges of the G940, but I have my doubts that a software change will be able to do that.

I hate having going back to my MSFF2, Cougar Throttle, and Saitek pedals after investing so much money in the G940, so I will tough it out awhile longer, hoping things will get better. At the moment the The MSFF2 > G940 stick, Cougar throttle > G940, and the Saitek Pro Rudders > G940 rudders. I decided to buy a new Hotas because Windows 7 doesn't load the MSFF2 programming software.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-15-2009, 09:09 AM
Tvrdi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chivas View Post
I never liked the CH flight sticks much because of the clunky gimbals made accurate shooting while maneuvering difficult. Well the G940 is 10X worse. G940 electric centering ,forcefeeback, and very week tension around the center makes the CH stick feel smooth. Your constantly having to change input force drastically, making accurate shooting very difficult. Hopefully a patch will be able smooth out the rough edges of the G940, but I have my doubts that a software change will be able to do that.

I hate having going back to my MSFF2, Cougar Throttle, and Saitek pedals after investing so much money in the G940, so I will tough it out awhile longer, hoping things will get better. At the moment the The MSFF2 > G940 stick, Cougar throttle > G940, and the Saitek Pro Rudders > G940 rudders. I decided to buy a new Hotas because Windows 7 doesn't load the MSFF2 programming software.
I trashed my completely new X52 PRO stick and now Im on MS SW Precision pro + X52 PRO throttle

I think ill buy 2 MS SW FF2 PRO joysticks to have them in reserve.....Tried CH stuff, Aviator, Evo......CH is durable yes....but thats all what is good there.......all those sticks are crap crap crap when it comes to precision and theyr all uncomfortable.....except MS SW

Last edited by Tvrdi; 12-15-2009 at 09:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-23-2010, 11:31 PM
VA_Deacon VA_Deacon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18
Default For FuzzyChickens

http://www.gamingshogun.com/Article/...iew_Event.html


" In the new Warthog, this older system has been replaced by a H.E.A.R.T (HallEffect AccuRate Technology) sensor. This new sensor uses magnetic fields to detect accurate stick location. In fact, the new sensor is so accurate that it has a resolution of 65,536 x 65,536 different locations! "
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-23-2010, 11:40 PM
VA_Deacon VA_Deacon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18
Default

http://www.gamingshogun.com/Article/...iew_Event.html


Quote:
Originally Posted by VA_Deacon View Post
"In the new Warthog, this older system has been replaced by a H.E.A.R.T (HallEffect AccuRate Technology) sensor. This new sensor uses magnetic fields to detect accurate stick location. In fact, the new sensor is so accurate that it has a resolution of 65,536 x 65,536 different locations! "
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-24-2010, 06:54 AM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!

If you read SimHQ, there is a hands-on article of TM Warthog stating it uses Hall sensors. A HOTAS I will buy for sure. Only downside is that it lacks the port to attach pedals so need to buy USB pedals as well.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.