![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, I haven't exposed argumentation previosly.
As for myself I think we need this plane. It was the mainstay of the IJA for early and mid war and was used until the end. The IJA doesn't have any attack aircraft in the sim, only figthers. And it's really a shame we have to use the G4M in army online missions. Please team Daidalus, try considerate give the IJA this bomber. It's a very noble task you gonna be doing by finally giving the army their own attack plane. I know people are asking for endless stuff, but I think you should considerate this request before definitely let this force without any significant bomber and thefore attack aircraft. Last edited by Wildnoob; 10-16-2009 at 11:35 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]()
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
What's the twin engined Biplane in the right centre of the lower image? Not a reflection on your modelling skills, which are clearly superb In what form are you thinking about releasing about these aircraft? IE via Daidalus Team in an official patch, or one of the mod sites? Either way, I will be looking forward to the completion of this project with much anticipation. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The large twin-engined biplane WIP is the Curtiss Condor, which China used in modest numbers as a transport/bomber. My next project is a FIAT CR.32 - used by the Chinese in small numbers. Then, the export version of the P-26, also used in small numbers by the Chinese. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello uberGeezer,
If you are serious in your 3D modelling for IL-2 and want to stick to the official IL-2 tech specifications in terms of polycount, LODs, textures, material setup, internal parts, etc. contact us at daidalos.team@gmail.com We can take a look at one of your models and give you our best feedback if you are heading the right direction. If you make a historical plane completely and within proper technical guidelines, we will insert it into the game, program its FM and release it in our future work. No strings attached. Last edited by mkubani; 10-19-2009 at 09:26 AM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not sure how practical this is or how hard it would be to implement this request but here goes.
When a airfield is under attack (sirens going) the icon for that airfield on the field selection screen flashes. (and maybe in the inflight map) This would give people some warning if vulchers are hanging around the field and would give people in the air a sort of priority-defend-airfield sort of message. What do people think? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
OMG!!! O_o!!! |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
My request regards the Breda SAFAT 12.7 guns; I believe there is a large consensus that they are way too weak. In particular the belting is definitely wrong, as it doesn't include at all the incendiary rounds. The following thread explains the issue.
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=2845 Just a quote from a post of uf_josse: "... Believe me or not, but i think not the right place to expose code of the game.... But, belting is AP /HET (with explosion radius of 4 cm, instead 15 for the US m.2 with similar power) and APT No API, no APIT.... era pictures show clearly API and APIT in belt with a more probable belting with API/APIT/HET.... (what i have done). So, clealy undermodeled..... ". The belting correction (and the correction of the radius of damage as well) would re-equilibrate the early war scenarios and add more interest to the dogfights. Thank you, Insuber |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Regarding SAFAT too weak, I think a table in post #5 in thread you linked explains it. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
LesniHU, Thanks for the answer. I understand that there are practical obstacles. And, far from me the idea to start a dispute about that ... But please take the time to read the whole thread mate. The table explains that SAFATs are weaker, but the ingame guns are way too weak, and this is the opinion of a lot of people. Moreover, regarding the in-game damage radius of 5 cm vs 15 cm of the Brownings ...is it realistic that the Browning is 9 times more effective than the Breda? I don't think so. Regards, Insuber PS: From the same website of the table : "The Italian Breda-SAFAT was the main weapon of Italian fighters in the early years of the war, and most (CR.42, G.50, Re.2000, and C.200) carried only two. Unfortunately for them, it was not a very good gun. It fired a Vickers 12.7 x 81SR cartridge, the same as adopted by the Japanese Army for the Ho-103, but the Japanese gun was lighter and fired faster. The Breda-SAFAT was reliable and accurate, however, and its ammunition was considered very effective" Last edited by Insuber; 10-18-2009 at 11:07 PM. |
![]() |
|
|