|
|
|
|
#1
10-03-2009, 06:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
The x65 uses force tranducers or something like that, essentially the stick doesn't move at all - it senses how much force is applied and translates that into control surface deflection.
Not sure how well it lends itself to WWI, WWII, and Korean sims where gunnery is till a big factor. CH is really the best choice unless you prefer style over substance. CH has no style - but it gets the job done better than anything else. It's accurate (more so than everything else) and reliable (the opposite of the cougar). I think CH has something in the works - a new addition to their flight sticks I'm guessing based on activity from other manufacturers. http://www.ch-hangar.com/forum/showp...6&postcount=10 No details yet, but at least they are admitting they are working on something. 
|
|
#2
10-03-2009, 06:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
CHPRODUCTS
FighterStick Pro Pedals Pro Throttle MFP New CH Eclipse yoke is nice, but only a few fighters in IL2 use yoike all the rest are stick. All the best of the best and fully programmable. Not Forcefeedback, but that'll be an advantage Online play. You won't be bouncing around everytime you shoot, or make a miniscule move of controls. Why because you get better registration on targets, which converts to more kills. Last edited by nearmiss; 10-03-2009 at 06:56 PM.
|
|
#3
10-04-2009, 12:24 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Their software is good. It looks like something out of Windows 3.1, but it is highly function, and will do anything you need it to. For a while I had a mapping which mapped the mini-stick on the throttle to the arrows keys, complete with a dead zone mapping that left a wide center dead zone, such that just bumping it wouldn't do anything, but if I pushed it past 60% deflection, then the key press would be activated. I was using it to control thrust vectoring in a SciFi game I was playing at the time. Some things that I'm still not fully sold on at the shape and button layout of the Fighterstick. It's encrusted in tilt switches, but I find that most of them, particularly on the head of the stick, aren't easy to reach, and generally, by the time I've mapped 16 different functions to something, I've forgotten what most of them were, and I find it to be a bit top heavy myself. It may just be that I spent most of my time using MS Sidewinders before I moved to CH, so your mileage may vary. Overall, I'd still say they are as good as you're going to get, without getting one that's custom built, and I've used a lot of joysticks over the years. Harry Voyager
|
|
#4
10-04-2009, 07:24 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Get:
CH F16 Figtherstick CH PRO throttle > see that no have "rotaries"... For pedal consider Saitek PRO Pedal - CH Pedal are too narrow... And some people have a six months unsolved problem: http://www.ch-hangar.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6323 If you don't have big hands you will have problems in reaching the main HAT in CH F16: http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/788/chhight.jpg And consider that is easy obtain spare parts for CH: http://www.chproducts.com/shop/parts.html Despite his Shop Cart not consider the "rest of the world"... You need to send email first. Sokol1 Last edited by Sokol1; 10-04-2009 at 07:31 PM.
|
|
#5
10-05-2009, 12:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The CH kit is hands down the most durable, precise and versatile kit for IL2.
|
|
#7
10-05-2009, 01:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
When I bought my first CH-Fighterstick (before 6 years?), I loved it so much that after a year I bought one more, just in case something happens to the first one.
Well, after all these years, the spare CH is still in its box gathering dust. The first stick is still as good as a new one! My only "complaint" with CH products is that Pro-throttle does not have rotaries and this is a small disadvantage when it comes to prop. pitch handling. But that's just a detail that matters in top-top-top level dogfights. Go for CH and don't listen to sirens!!!
|
|
#8
10-08-2009, 07:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
10-09-2009, 08:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Its hard to find a decent Hotas system today. They all have their drawbacks. I'm currently using an MSFF2 joystick, Cougar Throttle, and Saitek Rudder Pedals.
I also currently have the CH Fighter Stick, Saitek X52, Cougar Joystick, and Saitek Aviator and none of them have the precision of the now defunct MSFF2 joystick. The CH stick is very sturdy but I don't like the clunky feeling gimbals that can throw your aim off while travelling thru the x y axis. The Cougar is even worse, although you can buy a very expensive set of after market gimbals. My X52's deadzone problem made the stick usefull only when flying bombers. If I was buying today I would go for the Logitech G940. I don't particularly like the new X65 non movement pressure only joystick, expecially for WW2 aircraft. Who knows when CH will come out with something a little better.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
