Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2009, 01:00 PM
juz1 juz1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: No more team deathmatch, EVER!
Posts: 526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MorgothNL View Post
This is what a dev said in respondse to a P-51 topic:
So last updates: we have found some issues, that were indeed in the game. Long story how it happend, but it is fixed.
Also, good guess from you, guys, help us to increase performance of P51 - it has full fuel tanks, and this decreased it performance.

I 'hope' that the 'we have found some issues, that were indeed in the game', affected more planes. Because the FW190 is indeed not performing as well as it should be. It aint very bad, but it is not like it was in the PC version, and according to the devs, it should be.

We will just wait and see . I have high hopes that something will be fixed, that was keeping many boom and zoom planes, from reaching full potential
the FWs certainly haven't lived up to real world reputation...
________
BUY MFLB

Last edited by juz1; 02-24-2011 at 08:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2009, 01:02 PM
Ancient Seraph Ancient Seraph is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dutchman in Spain
Posts: 788
Default

Soo.. the devs put a lot of work into fixing the P-51 and all they get is more bitching about other planes .

JK . I hope eventually all planes will act as they're supposed to, if they don't already. Some adjustments to make B&Z more effective would be nice though.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2009, 01:05 PM
juz1 juz1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: No more team deathmatch, EVER!
Posts: 526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ancient Seraph View Post
Soo.. the devs put a lot of work into fixing the P-51 and all they get is more bitching about other players .

JK . .

fixed
________
Vapir no2

Last edited by juz1; 02-24-2011 at 08:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2009, 01:03 PM
King Jareth King Jareth is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: England
Posts: 246
Default

Will the "improvement" of the black/red out system increase there useability?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2009, 01:13 PM
MorgothNL MorgothNL is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by King Jareth View Post
Will the "improvement" of the black/red out system increase there useability?
that is a good question
The boom and zoom planes (such as FW190) are fast, making them more prone to give you a blackout during manouvres. Buton the other hand, your opponents wont be able to twist and turn so heavily either, so you might get a better shot at them. And also, getting a blackout more easily in a FW190, forces you to fly it, as it is supposed to be flow. Not turning! will cause a blackout with high speeds, and will cause you to lose all your much needed energy.

I think it will do some good, just have to be carefull not to dive at your target like a supersonic maniac, would be nice not to get a blackout, so you can avoid the ground
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2009, 01:19 PM
FOZ_1983 FOZ_1983 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Blackpool, England
Posts: 1,997
Default

it would be good if you could pick a pilot LOL.


Im be taking douglas bader!!! he could pull more "G's" than others because of his lack of legs gave him an unfair advantage in a dogfight haha.

I thought the general idea with a FW190 was head on, then pull up and do a half loop, then reapeat as many times as is needed before your target is dead.

The 190 had a superb roll rate and was fairly good in a climb, so after the head on pass the 190 could quickly get back aroudn ready to do it again.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2009, 01:23 PM
juz1 juz1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: No more team deathmatch, EVER!
Posts: 526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FOZ_1983 View Post
it would be good if you could pick a pilot LOL.


Im be taking douglas bader!!! he could pull more "G's" than others because of his lack of legs gave him an unfair advantage in a dogfight haha.

.
is that for real? I grew up hearing about people like Bader but never put 2and2 together about his G resistance....you learn something new everyday...
________
Free joomla themes

Last edited by juz1; 02-24-2011 at 08:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-29-2009, 01:24 PM
Ancient Seraph Ancient Seraph is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dutchman in Spain
Posts: 788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FOZ_1983 View Post
it would be good if you could pick a pilot LOL.


Im be taking douglas bader!!! he could pull more "G's" than others because of his lack of legs gave him an unfair advantage in a dogfight haha.

I thought the general idea with a FW190 was head on, then pull up and do a half loop, then reapeat as many times as is needed before your target is dead.

The 190 had a superb roll rate and was fairly good in a climb, so after the head on pass the 190 could quickly get back aroudn ready to do it again.

In my opinion head-on is never a safe tactic . What you describe is B&Z-ish, although I'd try it from the side or behind, most planes don't have cannons there . I think Fw was designed for B&Z, but it lacks the speed in-game.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-29-2009, 01:29 PM
FOZ_1983 FOZ_1983 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Blackpool, England
Posts: 1,997
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ancient Seraph View Post
In my opinion head-on is never a safe tactic . What you describe is B&Z-ish, although I'd try it from the side or behind, most planes don't have cannons there . I think Fw was designed for B&Z, but it lacks the speed in-game.

I found the lack of speed with the 190 to be a problem.

Once i unlocked it i took it straight into a dogfight, its a nice looking bird. Went head on, made a pass and fired all the guns. Deadly!!! didnt destroy target though, i then pulled up and went for the half loop to try again (the 190 should do this with ease) only to struggle in the climb and stall.

The 109 i was up against had no problems what so ever.

Boom and zoom isnt my thing though, i find it rather boring. Hence why i dont really use the german planes. I like to get on the 6 of my target
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-29-2009, 03:46 PM
InfiniteStates InfiniteStates is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 707
Default

Really? I found the opposite to be true. I've spent the last couple of (painful) days unlocking the Ta152 via 100 online kills with the FW series, and I found it to be extremely fast, but turns like a brick. In fact it reminded me more of a jet than a prop plane...

Admittedly I couldn't be bothered with it beyond arcade as it's way too prone to stalling, and speeds are super enhanced in arcade.

Ignore me if you want lol. Arcade is certainly no benchmark to really judge a flight model. FWs stall nearly as much as the P51 in any higher difficulties though.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.