the air forces know the secret for uber piloting the sports world doesnt

[raaaid]

you bring to many points, most irrelevant

we are discussing if the f16 stick has a 6mm dead zone

i call that bs, dont you agree?

so you agree with my original point of short run being an adavantage and the airworld using it, cool

well by making this thread i learnt you can have avery short run with the advanatges it brings and you can still have high precision by settin a gradual force damping

at least you make points not like the others out reasoned just can resource to personal attacks

taking into account the imput is the force that graph shows beyond discussion not apreciable dead zone

[Outlaw]

Originally Posted by raaaid

you bring to many points, most irrelevant

Why are they irrelevant? You are the one posting a link to a GAME controller and then claiming that it is an EXACT DUPLICATE of the stick as installed in the F-16 Viper.

It is so obvious that it's NOT the same as the F-16 stick that I can't even begin to think of any living entity (including single celled animals, plants, bits of random RNA, etc.) that could not understand such.

Originally Posted by raaaid

we are discussing if the f16 stick has a 6mm dead zone

Then why did you bring this up...

Originally Posted by raaaid

my original point is that a short run is an advnatge to pilot and the air wolrd apply it and the racing world doesnt

Which is it, the 6mm dead zone or your, "original point"?

Originally Posted by raaaid

i call that bs, dont you agree?

How could you possibly ask that question? I've CLEARLY stated my position multiple times. Really, how is it possible to misunderstand me?

How much weed have you smoked today?

Originally Posted by raaaid

so you agree with my original point of short run being an adavantage and the airworld using it, cool

Where did I state that I agreed with your original point? How is it possible to get a degree related to the English language without being able to understand English?

Originally Posted by raaaid

well by making this thread i learnt you can have avery short run with the advanatges it brings and you can still have high precision by settin a gradual force damping

First, the "advantages" you speak ARE NOT REAL AND DO NOT EXIST. However, if you assume that they do exist, IF YOU DAMP THE SIGNAL then you have lost the (nonexistent) "advantages".

Originally Posted by raaaid

at least you make points not like the others out reasoned just can resource to personal attacks

You have not, "out reasoned", anyone. All of your statement have been decimated by everyone posting in this thread. This includes those that didn't even relate to your original post.

Originally Posted by raaaid

taking into account the imput is the force that graph shows beyond discussion not apreciable dead zone

As I have said, SO WHAT? Why won't you respond to my posts where I CLEARLY state why that is irrelevant?

--Outlaw.

[hegykc]

Haha, this is still going

Why don't you setup the curves in your yoistick so that you have 10 times less travel than anybody else and fly with that.
And when you beat everyone in a dogfight, formation flying, take-off, landing and taxiing,
we can all agree that you're right and we're wrong.

Oh and, then fly a real life plane setup so that it has 10 times less demanding input, like an F16 with 2-3 pounds of max fore required, or an F-18 with 5cm of travel.