Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-28-2012, 11:54 AM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chivas View Post
the much more complex COD game engine
Really? How do you know it's MUCH more complex than the ROF engine?
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
  #2  
Old 09-28-2012, 12:10 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6S.Manu View Post
Really? How do you know it's MUCH more complex than the ROF engine?
I think it's because 777 have stated the limitations of their engine. They (apparently) have limitations with the top speeds and achievable heights of modelling in the atmosphere. A ROF flying mate told me, so don't shoot the messenger. It could be rubbish though, I'm interested to hear the truth though myself.
  #3  
Old 09-28-2012, 01:11 PM
Lurker_71 Lurker_71 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 52
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey View Post
I think it's because 777 have stated the limitations of their engine. They (apparently) have limitations with the top speeds and achievable heights of modelling in the atmosphere. A ROF flying mate told me, so don't shoot the messenger. It could be rubbish though, I'm interested to hear the truth though myself.
Also, RoF has a nasty fundamental flaw in how it models cross-winds effects. (in short, cross wind rolls the aircraft). Jason acknowledged it, and said there's nothing they can do to fix it, short of a whole rewrite.

Big flaw indeed for what is otherwise an excellent flight sim.
  #4  
Old 09-28-2012, 02:43 PM
6S.Tamat's Avatar
6S.Tamat 6S.Tamat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 133
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey View Post
I think it's because 777 have stated the limitations of their engine. They (apparently) have limitations with the top speeds and achievable heights of modelling in the atmosphere. A ROF flying mate told me, so don't shoot the messenger. It could be rubbish though, I'm interested to hear the truth though myself.
Funny because all the aircrafts in cod can't reach theirs ceiling, to not talk about clouds and meteo.
On the other side the complexity is growing with the new water simulation that rof is implementing.
After more than a year of "development " in my personal point of view the complexity of the sim is not either a good excuse or the reality. Something badly programmed is cot complex, it is only bad job.
__________________
  #5  
Old 09-28-2012, 03:16 PM
MadTommy MadTommy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 493
Default

For some reason this whole customer relationship reminds me of this sketch.



Watch it all... every bit is relevant, especially the end

  #6  
Old 09-28-2012, 05:45 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

So much for the 'theory' that 1C took the money and ran or that Luither does not care let alone post here anymore and that 1C customer relations are for not

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=34617
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #7  
Old 09-28-2012, 05:55 PM
MadTommy MadTommy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
So much for the 'theory' that 1C took the money and ran or that Luither does not care let alone post here anymore and that 1C customer relations are for not

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=34617
Oh everything is just perfect now.. how silly of us all. You are right and 90% of the community where talking crap as usual.

Lets see how things progress before you bath in your own self appointed smugness eh.
  #8  
Old 09-28-2012, 06:09 PM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
So much for the 'theory' that 1C took the money and ran or that Luither does not care let alone post here anymore and that 1C customer relations are for not

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=34617
LOL! I almost feel sorry for Ace, he thinks that when luthier pops his head in once every 6 months for a patch announcement that equals "good customer relations". It's sad really.
  #9  
Old 09-28-2012, 06:31 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

LOL You hard core types are too funny..

To the rest of you reading this post.. Note how they have to twist the words around and flat out make things up to justify thier positions..

For example.. Where did anyone say things are perfect now? Another example, a simple search of Luithers post will show that he has posted here several times in the last six months.. Not to mention Luither has had BS pass along his posts for severl months now

Talk about feeling sorry for someone..

Someone who has to lie to keep the lies alive!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #10  
Old 09-28-2012, 07:01 PM
zapatista's Avatar
zapatista zapatista is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Force10 View Post
LOL! I almost feel sorry for Ace, he thinks that when luthier pops his head in once every 6 months for a patch announcement that equals "good customer relations". It's sad really.
so in the last 2 months we have had 2 more patches and several appearances by luthier indicating progress (as well as semi-regular appearances from black6 with bits of news, err yes some a bit cryptic i grant that, but indicating communication nevertheless) and that he will try and answer questions, and all you can do is still focus on the negative ?

right now things are looking pretty good

why not go and test the latest patch and try and come up with some positive and negative elements, might be a bit more productive me thinks (presuming you are here because you are interested in getting a good ww2 aircraft simulator)
__________________
President Dwight D. Eisenhower 1953: Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone, it is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.