what happen when someone make true journalism?

[Skoshi Tiger]

Originally Posted by Hood

Regardless of what we say or believe he's innocent until proven guilty, and until a court says he raped or sexually assaulted someone then he didn't. Regardless of editorial bias the following is a fun read.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...wide-hunt.html

I can't stand the Mail normally.

Hood

No! He is either guilty or innocent. The full quote is that "Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law".

Regardless he will not be able to prove his innocence in any useful way until he stands before a court and faces the charges against him.

Hopefully his groupies have not intimidated and harrased his victums until they have dropped their charges! That would be truely sad.

Personally I just think that he is just a knobber and there are far more important things for the 'new' to be reporting about.

[ATAG_Doc]

I would not want to be him. Must be awful to have to live always looking over your shoulder not knowing if a drone just spotted you. But it's interesting to watch from the sidelines.

[Hood]

Originally Posted by Skoshi Tiger

No! He is either guilty or innocent. The full quote is that "Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law".

Regardless he will not be able to prove his innocence in any useful way until he stands before a court and faces the charges against him.

I'm talking from a legal perspective rather than what he did or did not do in fact. Your comment accepted the facts as alleged.

He does not have to prove his innocence - the prosecution has to prove his guilt. His huge problem is that he has already been convicted by the court of public opinion.

He seems like a knobber though - no argument there!

Hood

[bzc3lk]

Originally Posted by Skoshi Tiger

Regardless he will not be able to prove his innocence in any useful way until he stands before a court and faces the charges against him.

Here in lies the crux of the problem, which court?

Swedish or the US "kangaroo" court. I'll go with the second option, refer link.

http://www.smh.com.au/technology/tec...228-1u14o.html