![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
| View Poll Results: Pay £100 for a fixed COD (ROF style) | |||
| Yes! |
|
58 | 50.00% |
| No way! |
|
58 | 50.00% |
| Voters: 116. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here goes my English knowledge again
![]() Fixed : Quote:
It does not. Maybe your point of view, as someones here, is based on the flight simulator genre, where Microsoft Flight Simulator add-ons was a good DLC offer for example, so the DLC policy have not a negative approach. But my point of view is more general, the DLC policy as unique method of revenue have negative consequences in the quality and value of the product and finally stuck his development. I don´t consider RoF as a success, success was IL2 1946 for example, for me RoF its a stuck game, there no more future there other than buy the next plane. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://www.amazon.com/Rise-Flight-Th.../dp/B002CQAPWS Quote:
Based on your statment is it safe to assume that you are not aware of the fact that 777 is in the process of adding a new 'channel' map that will include the sea planes.. Which is in a nut shell what IL-2 did via it's sequals.. New maps and new planes.. So, if your consider RoF stuck, than you would also have to say IL-2 was/is stuck
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
On the upside, glad to see you took me off ignore, assuming you ever had me on ignore!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() But as I said a better use of effort would be concentrate in the engine development and his features as IL-2 does, and sell the high steps forward along with new theaters to have revenue, as BoM, that´s a road map with future due the constant development of new features and new api as DX11. A new map for a old engine is not a development to forward but add content to what you already have. If your business consist in nothing more than sell DLCs then the development gets stuck, guess is where they are now, and there no future other that make a channel map to continue making more planes for a stuck DX9 engine. Last edited by Buchon; 07-16-2012 at 01:20 AM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not that amazing, in that is probably the version that comes with all the add ones included.. I forget the name of it?
But if you look closer you will see that 777 provides the choice of buy a full boxed WWI game, i.e. http://www.amazon.com/Rise-Flight-Fi..._ob_vg_title_1 You know.. that thing you said they DID NOT PROVIDE And also 777 provides the choice of buy a download WWI game, i.e. http://www.amazon.com/Rise-Flight-Cr..._ob_vg_title_0 Which all goes back to that 777 providing 'choices' things I was telling you about That is your opinion, and is the reason why 777 can not and does not force anyone to buy it Quote:
Ah so you knew about it? So why did you say RoF is not a success and/or stuck when RoF is doing the same thing the original IL-2 did.. i.e. Producing new maps and new planes and than charging the user for new maps and new planes. In that the only difference in the two is RoF allows you to pick and choose each item, where as IL-2 took all the items and bundled them up which in turn did NOT allow you to pick and choose. Quote:
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 07-16-2012 at 01:55 AM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Misunderstanding so much, its not ?
I think that I have explained good enough. See you ~ |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
No, not at all.. Just a difference in opinions! S!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I wonder if there one of those RoF boxes for 250$ in my market place
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The last RoF patch added working synchronizer/interrupter gear (machine guns fire based on engine RPM when synchronized to fire through the propeller), vastly improved gun handling in the game and added some graphical improvements (sharper textures and heat blur). They are releasing new planes in the process and constantly improving the engine. And since you mentioned the upcoming channel map - we are not just talking about new landscape here (your point of new content), but some significant engine improvements. Like for example - working 3D water with wave physics and such. I am not going to argue about CloD "expansion" model tho. It's DUD concept and a suicide for such a small niche market. Every new sim is moving away from this model for a reason.
__________________
Windows 7 64-bit | AMD Phenom II X4 3.4 GHz | GeForce GTX 460 1Gb | 8 GB RAM | SSD | Track IR 5 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|