Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-22-2012, 04:15 PM
ems9 ems9 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 37
Default

adonys my personal opinion is, don't formalize your opinion already!
The game will have updates, and things will be fixed!
Both games have the same game engine so one game will be the shadow of the other.
I bet they will not release BoM until they got the game running well. (This is what I think).
I will just buy BoM if CoD runs well! If CoD runs well, BoM will run well too!

About your main suggestion.
1)
It look's great and it's what everyone want's to listen.
I don't think a game engine can be worked like that.
Like extreme development, you make a small release/feature each week.
In a short time span as a week working on the game engine(graphic engine etc), develop, test, fix, test and release. I bet that is impossible.
A monthly time span would be more likely. Even like that, when you are digging to much, it's easy to screw.
2)
BoM is a mod add on basically, just new planes, new maps, new objects, so there is no need for testing. Like I said they have the same engine, so they share the same features and problems! Just with different environments!

About everything else you said, I have the same opinion.

Last edited by ems9; 06-22-2012 at 04:19 PM.
  #2  
Old 06-22-2012, 05:02 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6S.Tamat View Post
If the team of rof would start a project on let's say pacific ww2 i bet that more than a risk would be an investment.
The fact that they haven't done it should tell you all you need to know about why 1C has no competition.
  #3  
Old 06-22-2012, 06:26 PM
6S.Tamat's Avatar
6S.Tamat 6S.Tamat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 133
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
The fact that they haven't done it should tell you all you need to know about why 1C has no competition.
IMHO the fact that they didn't do tells me only that they didn't choose to do it, I'm still not able to read the mind of the rof developers.
__________________
  #4  
Old 06-22-2012, 06:37 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6S.Tamat View Post
IMHO the fact that they didn't do tells me only that they didn't choose to do it, I'm still not able to read the mind of the rof developers.
Jason has posted the reason many times. Money.
  #5  
Old 06-22-2012, 07:17 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
Yes, I'm sure there must be someone out there who wants to risk a huge investment for a small market of crybabies.
Is it really that impossible for you to post without inserting a jab every other line? Strike two, vacation impending.
  #6  
Old 06-22-2012, 07:23 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt View Post
Is it really that impossible for you to post without inserting a jab every other line? Strike two, vacation impending.
Please don't ban me! I don't want to miss the whining about next Friday's announcement that the patch isn't ready yet...
  #7  
Old 06-23-2012, 03:36 AM
Robert's Avatar
Robert Robert is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 717
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
The fact that they haven't done it should tell you all you need to know about why 1C has no competition.

I don't remember the specific time frame, but Jason at one time wanted to do another theatre of WW2. I THINK it was very shortly before becoming involved with RoF. I also believe there had been speculative updates from 777 Studios declaring the possibility of WW2 CFS. These were over a year ago - one of Jason's" year in review/where we are going next year" updates. I haven't read more about that speculation since.

It's not easy. It's not cheap. We're a tuff crowd to please.
  #8  
Old 06-23-2012, 04:04 AM
nearmiss nearmiss is offline
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,687
Default

  #9  
Old 06-23-2012, 06:12 AM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert View Post
I don't remember the specific time frame, but Jason at one time wanted to do another theatre of WW2. I THINK it was very shortly before becoming involved with RoF. I also believe there had been speculative updates from 777 Studios declaring the possibility of WW2 CFS. These were over a year ago - one of Jason's" year in review/where we are going next year" updates. I haven't read more about that speculation since.

It's not easy. It's not cheap. We're a tuff crowd to please.
There is no time frame. He has repeatedly said that there is no money for a WW2 flight sim.
  #10  
Old 06-23-2012, 06:35 AM
Robert's Avatar
Robert Robert is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 717
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
There is no time frame. He has repeatedly said that there is no money for a WW2 flight sim.
That's what it came down to. I shoulda made that clear.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.