Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #411  
Old 05-07-2012, 07:33 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XL5 View Post
Wow...Did you read the last 10 past friday's updates ? Did you ever read : we will finally put out an ALPHA patch that will need to be tested after we did the internal BETA testing for so long and hte glitches we talk to you about and were the reason for so many delays won't be fixed after all...?
ANd once again, remember that all this waiting and "few more weeks" before release was to put out a working patch, with fixed clouds, grass, particules fx and so on...
SO...Now it is suddenly became an incomplete ALPHA ?...Ok then...You are right...I misread and misunderstood all past Bsix updates..My bad...
See, that's the problem right here. There's too many people on this forum who take too many things for granted and think they are set in stone, to the point where adapting to reality is considered a terminal sin.

Nothing personal, but i've got a very honest question: if doing things one way presents problems, shouldn't something else be tried?

Because by your reasoning, it seems that you are implying something to the effect of "if you can't do it the way you initially said, then don't do it at all and let's keep the bugs". I'm not being ironic here, i'm genuinely curious about your reasoning.

It's like driving on the road and saying "i'll brake here, enter the turn this way, accelerate through the apex up to X km/h, then move on to the next corner, etc, etc".
It works more or less ok when on a race track but not for every day driving, where pedestrians or stray dogs appear in front of you. Then the plan goes out the window and you improvise.

So, my question is very simple: is our final goal to get the sim fixed, or to keep transcripts about who said what and how plans change during the course of patching so that we can argue among ourselves and pass the time? Do we want to fly the sim or the forums?

Personally, i want it fixed. Everything else is secondary to me. I don't care if B6 says the sun is a yellow square today and tomorrow he changes his mind and says it's round but black, as long as they keep experimenting to find the best possible solution to the bugs and making progress here and there i'm fine with it.
Reply With Quote
  #412  
Old 05-07-2012, 08:12 PM
jimmythedeath jimmythedeath is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 14
Default A Alpha patch

YES finally we get to test, OK i did end up with a crash, sent in the Dump file, ok my review much better experience the micro shutters when other players are flying around have gotten less, also over citys, its playable, went from the micro shutters and 5 fps to like no shutters but u can hear them if that makes sense just barely, and like 10 - 15 fps over citys and in engagements. the Performance i can see it i can feel it with my rig all i got to say. i would say it is a 50% increase in performance, the fps might be slow but its being fast in the things that count, the engine feels very responsive now to inputs but more experimenting is needed on my part.


Jimmy OUT !!!!

OH yea

amd 8 core
gtx 580 3gig
8 gig ddr3 ram
Dual SSD 120 Sata 3 Raid 0 for OS drive.
Track IR
Saitek X52Pro
24" IPS Dell Monitor

Reply With Quote
  #413  
Old 05-07-2012, 08:27 PM
XL5
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt View Post
See, that's the problem right here. There's too many people on this forum who take too many things for granted and think they are set in stone, to the point where adapting to reality is considered a terminal sin.

Nothing personal, but i've got a very honest question: if doing things one way presents problems, shouldn't something else be tried?

Because by your reasoning, it seems that you are implying something to the effect of "if you can't do it the way you initially said, then don't do it at all and let's keep the bugs". I'm not being ironic here, i'm genuinely curious about your reasoning.

It's like driving on the road and saying "i'll brake here, enter the turn this way, accelerate through the apex up to X km/h, then move on to the next corner, etc, etc".
It works more or less ok when on a race track but not for every day driving, where pedestrians or stray dogs appear in front of you. Then the plan goes out the window and you improvise.

So, my question is very simple: is our final goal to get the sim fixed, or to keep transcripts about who said what and how plans change during the course of patching so that we can argue among ourselves and pass the time? Do we want to fly the sim or the forums?

Personally, i want it fixed. Everything else is secondary to me. I don't care if B6 says the sun is a yellow square today and tomorrow he changes his mind and says it's round but black, as long as they keep experimenting to find the best possible solution to the bugs and making progress here and there i'm fine with it.
I am still waiting to buy the game. I've got all Il2 series and all...Almost bought COD one year ago...It will be fixed soon...Hum...Almost bought it a month ago...Will be fixed soon...Almost bought it a week ago...Few thing to fix yet...And now, the FAMOUS patch is an ALPHA without the fixed bugs that were responsable for the delayed release of the" patch"...
You guys have the game, paid for it and hope for the best. You have been in this situation for a looong time now. You have been the Beta testers. Now you are ALPHA testers. No working clouds. No dynamic weather, radio,Etc.
I am neither an fanboy nor a whiner. I dont play COD at all !!!
I am just trying to figure out if, and when it will be worth buying COD instead of the sequel. That is all.
And of course, if 1C wants to adopt new ways for resolving issues because the old aren't working, (the ways they were doing things for the past 12 months lets say), it is their prerogative indeed...But it is not a very encouraging sign in terms of developpement progress though...Otherwise, they would keep going on, no ?
I do hope for the best with COD, but I've been following progress for more than 6 years now...ANd it seems far from completion, and far far away from what it was " supposed" to be.
Patience my friend !
Reply With Quote
  #414  
Old 05-07-2012, 08:34 PM
strom32 strom32 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 13
Default

A lot of people fighting and complaining in this thread. Perhaps this will be justified after the next patch if those items mentioned are not fixed. After all B6 did mention that these would only take a few more days. Until then why waste your time if the time mentioned is only a few more days?
Reply With Quote
  #415  
Old 05-07-2012, 08:35 PM
CaptainDoggles's Avatar
CaptainDoggles CaptainDoggles is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XL5 View Post
Wow...Did you read the last 10 past friday's updates ? Did you ever read : we will finally put out an ALPHA patch that will need to be tested after we did the internal BETA testing for so long and hte glitches we talk to you about and were the reason for so many delays won't be fixed after all...?
ANd once again, remember that all this waiting and "few more weeks" before release was to put out a working patch, with fixed clouds, grass, particules fx and so on...
SO...Now it is suddenly became an incomplete ALPHA ?...Ok then...You are right...I misread and misunderstood all past Bsix updates..My bad...
I don't understand... when BlackSix said this was an alpha patch... why did you think it would not be an alpha patch?
Reply With Quote
  #416  
Old 05-07-2012, 08:36 PM
XL5
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
B6 said that the patch was an alpha. If that wasn't good enough for you, you should not have downloaded it. Period.
You again ? haha! Always punching someone !
I dont have the game...yet Still waiting till it is working good for most of us. So: I am no whiner, and no fanboy...yet.
And by the way, I did NOT downloaded the patch. Period.
Reply With Quote Received Infraction
  #417  
Old 05-07-2012, 08:43 PM
Ataros Ataros is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: USSR
Posts: 2,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XL5 View Post
I am neither an fanboy nor a whiner. I dont play COD at all !!!
I am just trying to figure out if, and when it will be worth buying COD instead of the sequel. That is all.
Do not buy CloD till sequel is out. The CloD engine will be not good enough till then. ETA is 1 - 2 years probably.

This patch is not for you. It is only for those who want to alpha-test and send crash-dumps to 1C as stated in the patch notes. Thus, you have no reason to complain, flame or spam here.

If you think Activision or EA can do a better job please try to persuade them they can make a profitable WWII sim at all. Everyone will be glad if they make such commitment.
Reply With Quote
  #418  
Old 05-07-2012, 08:48 PM
Ataros Ataros is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: USSR
Posts: 2,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by strom32 View Post
A lot of people fighting and complaining in this thread. Perhaps this will be justified after the next patch if those items mentioned are not fixed. After all B6 did mention that these would only take a few more days. Until then why waste your time if the time mentioned is only a few more days?
Even if they are eager to make it this quick usually it takes longer. There are almost 300 bugs listed on the bugtracker waiting to be fixed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jibo View Post
keep in mind there is 22 persons working on cod/bom ... much less than on angry birds
Reply With Quote
  #419  
Old 05-07-2012, 09:11 PM
Freycinet Freycinet is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 696
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XL5 View Post
You know, FooBar was banned for bringing up the old patch thread...
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles View Post
Foobar was banned for resurrecting and old thread to troll everyone into thinking a patch has been released. I'm glad he got banned.
At least he went out with a bang... I got banned at SimHQ for writing that "I hope everyone feel they're getting their money's worth from their SimHQ membership"... Doesn't take much if a mod has a bone to pick with you...
__________________
My Il-2 CoD video web site: www.flightsimvids.com
Reply With Quote
  #420  
Old 05-07-2012, 09:18 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XL5 View Post
You again ? haha! Always punching someone !
I dont have the game...yet Still waiting till it is working good for most of us. So: I am no whiner, and no fanboy...yet.
And by the way, I did NOT downloaded the patch. Period.
OK, now I understand. You're just a troll.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.