Why does luthier even bother?

[Skoshi Tiger]

Originally Posted by SYN_Repent

perhaps you read my comment wrong, but you admit that when we are getting to the stage of 60fps then we can talk fine?? and tbh mate, we are hardly still in the new release stage are we?? six months has passed since then.......

i could show you rise of flight running at a constant 60 fps, during actual game play, not some silly black death benchmark,the old il2 also ran at 60 fps during game play, ya can have a full shaker of salt with this comment, watch you dont get any on ya though, you might melt

I've got ROF and on my system there is no way I can get 60FPS consistently. If your saying that the benchmark for fine is a consistent 60FPS your telling me that ROF cannot be considered 'fine'!

Black Death is supposed to push a system. What is the ROF equivalent?

Oh! And the language! I work with troubled children and I expect the sort of language you have been using at work (I'm paid for putting up with it) But like a lot others, I use this forum as a form of recreation and basically the words you are using are offensive and are against the rules for the forum.
I sure you are mature enough to understand it is uncalled for.

Have a nice day!

[SYN_Repent]

Originally Posted by Skoshi Tiger

Black Death is supposed to push a system. What is the ROF equivalent?

Oh! And the language!

first of all, yes your right, its supposed to push a system, but its not gameplay is it?? mr.nudge is playing the game, with high settings, using a sub par system (compared to up to date components) and claims it runs "fine", and as i stated, what is his opinion of fine?



@ nudge, check my posts again mate, there are a few where i have stated my system specs, i have discussed ATI crossfire, in the last beta and before then i had the game running fairly well, not satisfied, but better than some of the poor souls on here who are truly dissapointed, and that is with ATI crossfire, my statement to you was that your opinion of fine using those settings and an inferior rig, and my settings which are lower, are different.

I7 870 @ 4.2ghz
2x ATI 4890 1GB crossfire (working @ 42% per card, varies with settings (scaling) )
8GB ram
24" monitor
win 7 64

nudge, explain to me what exactly is a dedicated gaming machine?? even an xbox or playstation isnt one of these anymore.

[RAF_Nudge]

Originally Posted by SYN_Repent

first of all, yes your right, its supposed to push a system, but its not gameplay is it?? mr.nudge is playing the game, with high settings, using a sub par system (compared to up to date components) and claims it runs "fine", and as i stated, what is his opinion of fine?



@ nudge, check my posts again mate, there are a few where i have stated my system specs, i have discussed ATI crossfire, in the last beta and before then i had the game running fairly well, not satisfied, but better than some of the poor souls on here who are truly dissapointed, and that is with ATI crossfire, my statement to you was that your opinion of fine using those settings and an inferior rig, and my settings which are lower, are different.

I7 870 @ 4.2ghz
2x ATI 4890 1GB crossfire (working @ 42% per card, varies with settings (scaling) )
8GB ram
24" monitor
win 7 64

nudge, explain to me what exactly is a dedicated gaming machine?? even an xbox or playstation isnt one of these anymore.

I only use the machine for games not surfing the net and downloading torrents etc i have two laptops and another desktop for that but this is way off topic in relation to my first post.

Once again...YOU HAVE COMPLETLEY MISSED THE POINT OF MY FIRST POST

But to answer the question of FPS I am getting an avg of 20fps with fraps on those settings with my system what are you getting with yours? If you are getting this or more then whats your problem are you have game locks/freezes/crashes? If so then I refer to the original reason and topic for my first post and ask why have you not uploaded crash dumps etc?

I was under the impression that the game did not support dual cards..so i guess this could be the root of your problem given the following info.

Pixel Rate
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti will be much (more or less 35%) more effective at FSAA than the Radeon HD 4890 1GB, and able to handle higher resolutions better. (explain)

GeForce GTX 550 Ti
21600 Mpixels/sec

Radeon HD 4890 1GB
16000 Mpixels/sec

Difference: 5600 (35%)

SOURCE: hwcompare.com

My game runs and is very playable online and off I did also notice that most of your posts are simply digs at others with no real constructive point other than creating conlict and friction amongst those on the forums...and therefore really don't contribute to the forums in a productive way!