![]() |
|
CoD Multiplayer Everything about multiplayer in IL-2 CoD |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Part of the problem is the exaggerated comments that you die hard 109 pilots keep throwing out. The use of the word “UFO” and “Cheat” does not endure you to any of the guys that want to fly Red and in no way helps your cause. If this was a Spit II +12LBS the performance would be close to RL tested aircraft (what we have in CoD is suppose to be a Spit II +9 boost), so it is in no way out of the ordinary to see a Spit II perform to this level. Stick to the core and relevant argument that the other aircraft are under modeled and this one is over modeled and because of the gap should be excluded on those facts. The only thing you achieve by using BS rhetoric and exaggerations is to spur red pilots to take Spit II’s out just to spite you.
One more thing to keep in mind, the RAF aircraft that are modeled in CoD are all using 87 octane gas and are not up to the specification of the aircraft used during the BOB (with the exception of the present Spit II) which used 100 octane fuel and gave a considerable improvement in performance. This is going to be a hard fight for anyone who wants to fly Blue, you better get use to it. JD AKA_MattE
__________________
ASUS Crosshair IV Formula AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE @ 3.4ghz ZALMAN 120mm CPU Cooler Intel X25-M 160GB SSD Mushkin Enhanced Redline 8GB MSI R7970 OC ATI Catalyst 12.3 KINGWIN Mach 1 1000W COOLER MASTER HAF 932 MajorBoris "Question: Do you forum more than you fly?" raaaid "i love it here makes me look normal" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I think weve all stated its either because the Spit2 is overmodeled OR the other AC are undermodeled...The 109 sealevel speed is def undermodeled.. No we wont get used to it either so take yer smart ass comments else where..read between the lines instead of writing a load of turd How many times have you read 'The FM's are porked, they need work..the Spit2 looks like its the only AC near to its RL values'.. Sry m8 but posting crap like that just irritates people...get your facts straight before you post.. I think we all have played Sims enough to know how well and good a fighter the Spit is..Ive been flying it since day1 in Il2 so im no die hard 109 pilot that i can assure you...compared to what the 109 has in the way of top speed the Spit2 does seem like a super 'uber' AC in comparison Last edited by Ze-Jamz; 09-15-2011 at 09:10 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If this is what we are expected to live with I fear for the day the spit mk 9 +25 boost arrives, the mk2 already outperforms the 109 so much
![]()
__________________
![]() Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you see me on the server you know Im attacking bombers..mostly..someone climbs up to me they normally end up back down again..this argument doenst really concern me as much as the flyers that are not interested in AI, they just want to DF
So Im not really biased here..hence why i voted for it to be put way back inland etc etc so i get a bit more action up high This is the bit i dont get: If before everyone was happy flying either TnB in a Spit or more BnZ in a Hurri and the blues done whatever in their 'Only' fighter why now introduce something that is causing masses of friction and taking away peoples enjoyment online..? Thats the bit I dont get..Its left out=no arguments..Intoduced=all this Is it so hard for us to agree that the fighters ingame now APART from the Spit2 need work so if thats the case why dont we leave it out like it was before and no one complained..not Red not Blue Simples.. Last edited by Ze-Jamz; 09-15-2011 at 09:00 AM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|