Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-10-2011, 03:03 AM
Buchon Buchon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 437
Default

Is a nice entertainment, does not ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-10-2011, 06:56 AM
SsSsSsSsSnake SsSsSsSsSnake is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: England
Posts: 288
Default

well im glad i dont read them anymore
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-10-2011, 08:18 AM
revi revi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Pukekohe New Zealand
Posts: 80
Default

Oh please...dont cry about your dissapointments of Clod.
This thread is not for that.
I'm sure your darling will one day grow into a lovely swan, & your love and patience will be rewarded.
What Im saying is that there parts of both WOP and CLOD that bought together, would give a well needed addition to the Simming world.
(Most of you hardcore CloDers have actually admitted that already in your response).

Never mind being able to count the nostral hairs of the panzer commander.
Give me a game that runs well, looks good, and gives a believible scrap, & without having to buy a new rig.

Last edited by revi; 05-10-2011 at 08:30 AM. Reason: added text
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-10-2011, 08:53 AM
SsSsSsSsSnake SsSsSsSsSnake is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: England
Posts: 288
Default

Never mind being able to count the nostral hairs of the panzer commander.

now that is funny
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-10-2011, 09:15 AM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Revi your an ass

Open your eyes the graphics in wop are not great.

The ground looks good but that's because they only have a small area to load and can fill it with detail. Cod on the other hand has incrediable detail from all heights and is ******* HUGE in comparison.

Looking ahead Wop 2 will look fantastic BUT it will not be for everyone's taste.

Take stalker and metro2033 for a kind of example. Metro is a fantastic game and has tones of atmosphere and is an awesome game BUT IMHO it only holds up against stalker in terms if graphics everything else stalker clearly kicks ass because it's not confined by rails I.e. Corridor shooter. I am sure the same will be said for wop2 sure it's gonna look nice and will be fun to play but at the end if the day it's a dogfight game while clod is the whole shabang the real deal.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.

Last edited by JG52Krupi; 05-10-2011 at 09:20 AM. Reason: Too much abusing sorry
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-10-2011, 09:44 AM
jojimbo jojimbo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 61
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post

Open your eyes the graphics in wop are not great.

The ground looks good but that's because they only have a small area to load and can fill it with detail. Cod on the other hand has incrediable detail from all heights and is ******* HUGE in comparison.
wop terrain graphics are some of the best ever created:FACT

the area CoD loads is "smaller" than CFS3 and runs like a bitch:FACT
(was dissapointed there were no channel islands)

WoP loads and runs smoothe, there definately an engine problem with CoD.

CoD terrain and graphics look terrible:FACT

Last edited by jojimbo; 05-10-2011 at 09:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-10-2011, 10:23 AM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jojimbo View Post
wop terrain graphics are some of the best ever created:FACT

the area CoD loads is "smaller" than CFS3 and runs like a bitch:FACT
(was dissapointed there were no channel islands)

WoP loads and runs smoothe, there definately an engine problem with CoD.

CoD terrain and graphics look terrible:FACT
U clearly need your eyes testing FACT, the terrain looks good fir me its optimised for all heights.

There is nothing wrong with the terrain in clod other than the colors and last time I flew at a low height in wop I was duisturbed by how bad it is.

Wop runs fine because it doesn't push your hardware clod does and that has nothing to do with the bad optimisation it's simply a FACT that it would push our hardware like the original il2 did and RoF etc
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.