Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   WoP + CoD = Wopcod (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=22646)

revi 05-08-2011 03:26 AM

WoP + CoD = Wopcod
 
With the graphic brilliance of WoP and the depth of CoD, a gap in the
market has been exposed...that SIM that has both.

speculum jockey 05-08-2011 04:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by revi (Post 280109)
With the graphic brilliance of WoP and the depth of CoD, a gap in the
market has been exposed...that SIM that has both.

I think there might an exposed gap in your head.

Wop's graphics are stylish, and deceiving, not brilliant. Currently CloD is operating at less than peak efficiency. When it's fully patched I'm sure nobody will even remember WOP let alone compare it's misleading graphics to CloD.

ATAG_Doc 05-08-2011 04:56 AM

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_rqH4fUbko2...1600/troll.jpg

SsSsSsSsSnake 05-08-2011 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by speculum jockey (Post 280116)
I think there might an exposed gap in your head.

Wop's graphics are stylish, and deceiving, not brilliant. Currently CloD is operating at less than peak efficiency. When it's fully patched I'm sure nobody will even remember WOP let alone compare it's misleading graphics to CloD.

I will, I love it:)

furbs 05-08-2011 09:12 AM

Forget the FM, DM, planes, sounds, lighting, size of maps, ground handling, fire and smoke affects, wierd green tint and online gametypes...they all are CRAP in WOP, i think i played it for about 2 hours then unistalled.

The only aspects of WOP i think are better than COD that i would gladly swap are...
The very well done way fields and towns are rendered and feel(but not the green tint)
The clouds, not fantastic but better than what we have now.
Tracers(just my personal taste)

Doc_uk 05-08-2011 10:18 AM

Plz, no more of these threads, i cant take anymore:rolleyes:

Kongo-Otto 05-08-2011 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doc_uk (Post 280183)
Plz, no more of these threads, i cant take anymore:rolleyes:

+1!

Hatch 05-08-2011 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by speculum jockey (Post 280116)
I think there might an exposed gap in your head.

Wop's graphics are stylish, and deceiving, not brilliant. Currently CloD is operating at less than peak efficiency. When it's fully patched I'm sure nobody will even remember WOP let alone compare it's misleading graphics to CloD.

:) Of course WoP graphics are brilliant.

We're not really flying over Kent are we ?
So both are trying to deceive you into thinking you are.

And which tricks are employed to "simulate" that is irrelevant.

Let's just wait and see what the future brings.
Some competition is a good thing for the flight sim world.

Now what I'm hoping for is a BOB2, OFF, WoP, CloD, RoF Sim.:cool:

Meusli 05-08-2011 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by revi (Post 280109)
With the graphic brilliance of WoP and the depth of CoD, a gap in the
market has been exposed...that SIM that has both.

Cheers Revi, we all look forward to your new game release and hope that it beats both CLOD and WOP in sales. Being such an expert and all it can not possibly go wrong...

Mysticpuma 05-08-2011 11:20 AM

I wonder where Oleg Maddox has gone to?

What if he joined up with Gaijin (who make WoP)......he could have a Fully Functional Death Star, as-long as he remembered to fill a 2-meter vent-shaft!

I like both IL2:HSFX5.1 and WoP....I have both, they are both great IMHO.

I don't think WoPCoD would work, I'd much rather see "Pray Clod gets Wings"

:rolleyes:

Cheers, MP


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.