Quote:
Originally Posted by PantherAttack2
I for one believe that some people will adapt (blabla) and some people won't.
|
My 'adapt blabla' was referenced to an earlier comment about how pilots in the actual WWII would adapt to the jets and all that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PantherAttack2
Jets are the fastest, but they are still worse in all other ways compared to propeller planes.
|
Worse in what?
Arado:
- Payload? Not as much as the B17, but that's compensated for by the short time it takes to reach the target, drop bombs, respawn and come back again.
- Gunners? Not as much as any bomber, but that's compensated for by the speed, with which no piston pilot can even dream of flying.
- Manouvrability? It'll turn just as hard or easy as a B17. Admittedly, it's less agile then the He-111, but that's compensated for by payload.
Fighter jets:
- Armament? Me-262 has some nice cannons on there, with less recoil than similar planes.
- Manouvrability? Obviously compensated for with speed.
- Armor? So what? It's not like anyone keeps up.
I have respect for people that can B&Z, and with some planes you must, but all the planes that are designed for B&Z instead of T&B are still vulnerable to other aircraft, except for the jets. A master of B&Z will be invincible in a jet, period. Unless someone else grabs a jet.
09-21-2009, 08:08 PM
Threaded Mode