Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-01-2013, 12:26 PM
Sneaksie Sneaksie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 823
Thumbs up IL-2 Sturmovik: Battle of Stalingrad Press Previews after 1C Event

SimHQ
http://www.simhq.com/air-combat/il2-...d-preview.html

Just Press Start
http://justpressstart.net/1c-journal...of-stalingrad/

http://justpressstart.net/1c-journalists-at-play-2013/

IGN
http://www.ign.com/blogs/capitalistp...anes-and-tanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-14-2013, 05:01 PM
SPUDLEY1977 SPUDLEY1977 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 108
Default BOD, CLOD, IL-2 Series, 777, Battle of Stalingrad

CLOD appeared to be a reskinned, retextured IL-2 program engine AND with only a couple of planes Ported in a non optimized engine that does not allow the scaling with modern or semi-current PC components.

The videos of BOS do not appear to offer anything tangible over CLOD. When combined with the lack of Allied aircraft and the seeming intent to build for low end PC's and DX9 it is unlikely that this will represent the long lasting IL-2 series. Just another variant of the CLOD business model which we all spent $60 US on with a long laundry list of promises which were advertised promises never delivered.

Based on the track record and the current videos WITHOUT any air combat footage = no pre-purchase, we expect no purchase on release based on the limited business model offered.

Still disappointing indeed.

Last edited by SPUDLEY1977; 09-14-2013 at 05:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-15-2013, 06:49 PM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SPUDLEY1977 View Post
CLOD appeared to be a reskinned, retextured IL-2 program engine AND with only a couple of planes Ported in a non optimized engine that does not allow the scaling with modern or semi-current PC components.

The videos of BOS do not appear to offer anything tangible over CLOD. When combined with the lack of Allied aircraft and the seeming intent to build for low end PC's and DX9 it is unlikely that this will represent the long lasting IL-2 series. Just another variant of the CLOD business model which we all spent $60 US on with a long laundry list of promises which were advertised promises never delivered.

Based on the track record and the current videos WITHOUT any air combat footage = no pre-purchase, we expect no purchase on release based on the limited business model offered.

Still disappointing indeed.
I'm with you on some of this but the business model argument is different here. They intend to go with a Rise of Flight model (which served them well in the past) in combination with a more traditional package release. The difference in business model is a steady flow of cash to fund additional projects which, in the case of Rise of Flight, has lead to a steady increase in available aircraft and even an additional map. World War II for me is quite a bit larger in scope so it may be a challenge but in theory this type of business model has been shown to be successful.

The DX9 bit is hardly an issue for me. The engine itself is a strong one with quite a few features and its already been in the hands of players for a long time now.

Cliffs of Dover was a traditional monolithic release with the $60 box and no further plans.

This is an established engine and a new but successful business model. It needs some more videos and I'd like to see some proper air combat sequences... but calling this a rehash of Cliffs of Dover is unfair I think. It has some merits and it has some areas to be cautious about.

I'm more pessimistic about Oleg's new DCS related WWII sim crowdsourced funding system. But we'll see!
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-24-2014, 03:15 PM
FlyingRustBucket FlyingRustBucket is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceFire View Post
I'm with you on some of this but the business model argument is different here. They intend to go with a Rise of Flight model (which served them well in the past) in combination with a more traditional package release. The difference in business model is a steady flow of cash to fund additional projects which, in the case of Rise of Flight, has lead to a steady increase in available aircraft and even an additional map. World War II for me is quite a bit larger in scope so it may be a challenge but in theory this type of business model has been shown to be successful.

The DX9 bit is hardly an issue for me. The engine itself is a strong one with quite a few features and its already been in the hands of players for a long time now.

Cliffs of Dover was a traditional monolithic release with the $60 box and no further plans.

This is an established engine and a new but successful business model. It needs some more videos and I'd like to see some proper air combat sequences... but calling this a rehash of Cliffs of Dover is unfair I think. It has some merits and it has some areas to be cautious about.

I'm more pessimistic about Oleg's new DCS related WWII sim crowdsourced funding system. But we'll see!
They could atleast start after the game's release. I still can't believe the FW 190 and La-5 are day 1 DLC or that there is day 1 DLC at all. I liked to believe that these practices were only performed by the big corporations or something.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2014, 08:19 PM
GF_Mastiff's Avatar
GF_Mastiff GF_Mastiff is offline
71st_Mastiff
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: EL Centro
Posts: 890
Default good fight

http://youtu.be/keVsKqqLexY
__________________
71st Eagle Squadron
www.anon6.com - Blogger on DCS Series
71st Mastiff's You-Tube
" any failure you meet is never a defeat; merely a set up for a greater come back "
Asus||i7x5930k||16gb3200||GTX10808gb||ATX1200Corsa ir||CBTitanium7.1||Win10x64||TrackIr4Pro/ir||gladiator pro mkII||siatekpedals||X52Throttle||G15Keyboard/RazerMouse||
32"LCD||2x7" lilliputs,1x9inc
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-30-2014, 01:55 AM
Tempest123's Avatar
Tempest123 Tempest123 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 389
Default

looks nice but god I hate this micro-transaction dlc c***p, like release a game already ($60-$70), then maybe an add on with planes, new theater, missions etc, I'd pay $20 to $30 for that. not this $10 a plane, $5 for scarf stuff. If I wanted that I would go play CoD or candy crush. Feels like stuffing quarters in an arcade. Ahem, rant over.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-23-2014, 05:05 PM
DuxCorvan's Avatar
DuxCorvan DuxCorvan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cádiz, Spain
Posts: 86
Default

Too expensive, too many microtransactions. I don't mind paying for real expansions, but it seems like I'm paying for minor pieces detached from the game for that purpose, and God I hate that.

I won't buy until there's a good deal for some "Gold" complete version out there.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-24-2014, 10:47 PM
Pips Pips is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Canberra ACT
Posts: 55
Default

I hate ( and totally disagree with) the whole sales concept behind the ROF and BOS. Irrespective of whether the aircraft are well modelled or not, that aspect alone kills the sim the for me.

It's a pass. I'll stick with IL-2 and OFF.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-25-2014, 01:22 AM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

I just figured out my computer does not meet the minimum spec for BoS.

Oh well. Spending $1500 every four odd years, just to shuffle pixels around on a screen is really losing it's appeal to me these days.

This hobby is just getting too expensive to bother with anymore.

Fun while it lasted though.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-25-2014, 07:11 AM
Juri_JS Juri_JS is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuxCorvan View Post
Too expensive, too many microtransactions. I don't mind paying for real expansions, but it seems like I'm paying for minor pieces detached from the game for that purpose, and God I hate that.

I won't buy until there's a good deal for some "Gold" complete version out there.
There are no microtransactions in BoS, the sales concept is different to RoF. You can buy the standard edition (8 flyable aircraft) or the premium edition (10 flyable aircraft). If you like to upgrade the standard edition you can buy the Fw-190 and La-5 separately.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.