View Single Post
  #10  
Old 08-28-2012, 09:05 PM
icarus icarus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by senseispcc View Post
Nearly everybody said the same thing about the sequels of the first IL2. But never forget IL2 did profit of a great step forward in hardware performance at a cheap price but COD does begin his live when there is a world crisis, pc prices are high and for the first time the performances of pc's are stagnating since the beginning of the pc revolution. Between IL2 and IL2 1946 I changed twice my pc now I cannot because of the prices and the slow progresses of the performances, I am not changing my machine to gaining 5 or 10 % fps.
Sorry here is the proof you are wrong that they were saying the same thing about Il-2 as they were about CoD on release.

The review aggregator Metacritic gives IL-2 Sturmovik a score of 91 out of 100, while GameRankings, another review aggregator, gives a score of 91.31%
Gamespot 9.2

CoD
Metacritic 60/100 userscore 5.4
Gamespot 4.0

There is plenty more where that came from. Google.
The reviews are vastly worse for CoD than any of its predecessors.
Reply With Quote