Quote:
Originally Posted by zwiebacksaege
So you complain about how we can dare to raise critics on a beta patch because you think we don't understand the word "beta"? Well the word "patch" is also inside this, dear friends!
And patch in my opinion means that an existing thing is made better.
I just don't understand why formerly working things need to be destroyed for placing new features - this is just not what I expect to be a "patch" - beta or not. Maybe we just need a new name for it.  midnight try-out or something like that... |
I see your point. It's a thing that I stated long time ago.
Here we are not testing a "patch". We are testing a new version of the game.
So we should not call it "Beta-Patch" but "CoD Version X - Beta".
When the game will be finished (speaking about contents) then we'll be provided with real patches.
Look at the ugly thing called "Red Orchestra 2": the game is complete but is a mess (so many bugs!) and I'm really mad at it, because without the bugs it would be enjoyable. This game needs patches.
Instead I don't care about CoD's bugs since IMO it's still a unplayable game (and infact I'm not actually playing with it). This game needs to be finished.