Quote:
Originally Posted by vicinity
No, and I wouldn't expect them to provide me a new trackir 5 if I had one of the old ones either, I would however appreciate them more as a customer if they continued to support their product. It's the same with games, if a company continues to support it and remove bugs etc. their customers will be more happy. I would buy a trackir tomorrow if I could afford it but I wouldn't be happy if they decided to stop supporting the product to encourage sales of their latest one.
Note: I am just saying why some people might not be happy about it, and not what they as a company should/shouldn't do.
|
I think we understand the sentiment Vicinity but you've got to keep in mind that with progress and further deveopment comes upset for some. Me? I like the idea of floppies but I can adapt and move on. It won't be long before IDE interface and platter HD's are relegated to the dustbin of history either.
{I don't drink coca cola, or similar, as it is just cr@p)
*Edit
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadBlaster
Novotny, NP has every right to encrypt their code. You don't understand the issue. This is about NP creating a barrier to a market via their NDA with 1C to maintain an artificial monopoly.
|
Finally, you agree NP are allowed to encrypt their code - yeehar. It needs to be understood though there is no monopoly though... proven by Mouse Look (aka Freelook).